Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use lbfgsb as the default solver #726

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 28, 2024
Merged

Use lbfgsb as the default solver #726

merged 4 commits into from
Mar 28, 2024

Conversation

Vaibhavdixit02
Copy link
Member

Checklist

  • Appropriate tests were added
  • Any code changes were done in a way that does not break public API
  • All documentation related to code changes were updated
  • The new code follows the
    contributor guidelines, in particular the SciML Style Guide and
    COLPRAC.
  • Any new documentation only uses public API

Additional context

Add any other context about the problem here.

@ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member

One issue with having it as the default is that it's type restricted though. We really should invest the time to make a good one from NonlinearSolve.jl to avoid that.

@Vaibhavdixit02
Copy link
Member Author

I am not sure the NonlinearSolve one will trivially work for many cases right now. The linesearch in LBFGSB is exceptional, but yes I do plan to spend time to improve the implementation in SimpleOptimization.jl soon.

@Vaibhavdixit02 Vaibhavdixit02 merged commit 8310517 into master Mar 28, 2024
40 of 42 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants