Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix downgrade CI #619

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Feb 10, 2024
Merged

Fix downgrade CI #619

merged 6 commits into from
Feb 10, 2024

Conversation

ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Project.toml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 10, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (1a148f4) 38.85% compared to head (f52ff79) 38.81%.
Report is 9 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #619      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   38.85%   38.81%   -0.05%     
==========================================
  Files          55       55              
  Lines        4272     4261      -11     
==========================================
- Hits         1660     1654       -6     
+ Misses       2612     2607       -5     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Project.toml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Project.toml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Project.toml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@ChrisRackauckas ChrisRackauckas merged commit dd017af into master Feb 10, 2024
32 of 43 checks passed
@ChrisRackauckas ChrisRackauckas deleted the ChrisRackauckas-patch-2 branch February 10, 2024 21:04
SymbolicIndexingInterface = "0.3.3"
Tables = "1.11"
TruncatedStacktraces = "1.4"
Zygote = "0.6.67"
julia = "1.9"
julia = "1.10"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why is it necessary to bump the Julia requirement?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We just support the coming LTS. If anyone wants to decrease that, they would have to commit to supporting it for all of SciML.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants