Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement a Base.show for OptimizationStats #652

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 20, 2024

Conversation

nathanaelbosch
Copy link
Contributor

@nathanaelbosch nathanaelbosch commented Mar 20, 2024

DEStats are nicely presented in the REPL. This PR implements the same functionality for OptimizationStats.

Checklist

  • Appropriate tests were added
  • Any code changes were done in a way that does not break public API
  • All documentation related to code changes were updated
  • The new code follows the
    contributor guidelines, in particular the SciML Style Guide and
    COLPRAC.
  • Any new documentation only uses public API

`DEStats` are nicely presented in the REPL. This PR implements the same functionality for `OptimizationStats`.
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 20, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 7 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 38.43%. Comparing base (9cd4382) to head (4ba2869).

Files Patch % Lines
src/solutions/optimization_solutions.jl 0.00% 7 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #652      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   38.49%   38.43%   -0.07%     
==========================================
  Files          55       55              
  Lines        4291     4298       +7     
==========================================
  Hits         1652     1652              
- Misses       2639     2646       +7     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@ChrisRackauckas ChrisRackauckas merged commit 3746cda into SciML:master Mar 20, 2024
28 of 42 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants