-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 105
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor: improve remake, use SII.remake_buffer, respect model defaults #658
refactor: improve remake, use SII.remake_buffer, respect model defaults #658
Conversation
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #658 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 30.03% 31.28% +1.25%
==========================================
Files 55 55
Lines 4309 4360 +51
==========================================
+ Hits 1294 1364 +70
+ Misses 3015 2996 -19 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
1992c9f
to
e796596
Compare
@@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ DataFrames = "1.6" | |||
Distributed = "1.10" | |||
DocStringExtensions = "0.9" | |||
EnumX = "1" | |||
ForwardDiff = "0.10.36" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we shouldn't have this dependency here
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's used in remake_tests.jl
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
oh just a test dependency?
Checklist
contributor guidelines, in particular the SciML Style Guide and
COLPRAC.
Additional context
Add any other context about the problem here.