Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: improve remake, use SII.remake_buffer, respect model defaults #658

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Apr 1, 2024

Conversation

AayushSabharwal
Copy link
Member

Checklist

  • Appropriate tests were added
  • Any code changes were done in a way that does not break public API
  • All documentation related to code changes were updated
  • The new code follows the
    contributor guidelines, in particular the SciML Style Guide and
    COLPRAC.
  • Any new documentation only uses public API

Additional context

Add any other context about the problem here.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 28, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 88.67925% with 12 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 31.28%. Comparing base (7888fa4) to head (a437026).

Files Patch % Lines
src/remake.jl 89.21% 11 Missing ⚠️
src/solutions/solution_interface.jl 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #658      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   30.03%   31.28%   +1.25%     
==========================================
  Files          55       55              
  Lines        4309     4360      +51     
==========================================
+ Hits         1294     1364      +70     
+ Misses       3015     2996      -19     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@AayushSabharwal AayushSabharwal marked this pull request as ready for review March 28, 2024 16:43
@@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ DataFrames = "1.6"
Distributed = "1.10"
DocStringExtensions = "0.9"
EnumX = "1"
ForwardDiff = "0.10.36"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we shouldn't have this dependency here

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's used in remake_tests.jl

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

oh just a test dependency?

@ChrisRackauckas ChrisRackauckas merged commit ae4f9a8 into SciML:master Apr 1, 2024
33 of 42 checks passed
@AayushSabharwal AayushSabharwal deleted the as/better-remake branch April 1, 2024 12:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants