Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ordering the elements in the output #247

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 14, 2023
Merged

Ordering the elements in the output #247

merged 3 commits into from
Nov 14, 2023

Conversation

pogudingleb
Copy link
Collaborator

Functions for assessing identifiability now return OrderedDict in which the ordering is

  • if funcs_to_check argument was passed, then the ordering is the same as in funcs_to_check
  • otherwise first the states are listed (in the same order as in the system) and then parameters.

This PR addresses #244

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 14, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (2ff1a9d) 65.70% compared to head (f0a111d) 88.00%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #247       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   65.70%   88.00%   +22.29%     
===========================================
  Files          25       25               
  Lines        3184     3192        +8     
===========================================
+ Hits         2092     2809      +717     
+ Misses       1092      383      -709     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@pogudingleb pogudingleb merged commit c5738cd into master Nov 14, 2023
8 checks passed
@pogudingleb pogudingleb deleted the ordering_output branch November 14, 2023 21:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant