-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 54
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add note on differences from standard CosmWasm Sub-message Behavior #165
Open
luca992
wants to merge
1
commit into
SecretFoundation:gitbook
Choose a base branch
from
luca992:patch-1
base: gitbook
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey, I'm not sure I understand the difference any chance you can comment with an example of how the data is serialized on other cw 1 chain compared to SCRT serialization?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The difference is that cw 1 chains have
msg.result.data = **MsgInstantiateContractResponse protobuf binary**
for example terraswap decodes that data here:
https://github.com/terraswap/terraswap/blob/48e399eaa2e89cca4da8c7b20c9f5512a47ec36d/contracts/terraswap_factory/src/contract.rs#L231
But on secret 1.4.0:
msg.result.data
just returns nullI'm guessing it's a bug, based on this comment:
// note: even if contractAddr == nil then contractAddr.String() is ok // \o/🤷🤷♂️🤷♀️🤦🤦♂️🤦♀️
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As you can see no data is returned for
msg.result.data
But, on other chains they get:
msg.result.data = **MsgInstantiateContractResponse protobuf binary**