This Python3 library provides an easy interface to the bitcoin transaction data structures. This is based on https://github.com/petertodd/python-bitcoinlib, but is focused only on providing the tools to build, manipulate and sign bitcoin transactions, and related data structures.
It does not aim to be "The Swiss Army Knife of the Bitcoin protocol", but rather be a more specialized tool for handling transactions and associated data, with a focus on correctness, consistency, and developer ergonomics.
- Network-related code that deals with network messages and blocks is removed.
- Some API have changed and may be not compatible with old code (see below)
- libsecp256k1 is used for signing and verifying. Signing by libsecp256k1 is deterministic, per RFC6979.
- Support for PSBT (BIP174 Partially-signed transactions)
- HD keys support
- Easier to build code that supports and interacts with other bitcoin-based blockchains (see https://github.com/Simplexum/python-litecointx and https://github.com/Simplexum/python-elementstx)
- A wrapper for
libbitcoinconsensus
's script verification function is included - RPC API wrapper is 'raw' - does not convert the results of the calls to the library objects.
- Fully type-annotated and statically checked with mypy
The switch from v0.10.x to v1.0.0 was done because of the big refactoring effort that was made to improve the consistency of the library API, make it more composeable and maintainable. This required significant API breakage, and it made sense to bump the version.
The first release of the v1.0.x version introduced significant amount of new code (note that any new code compes with possibility of new bugs), and increased the differences from python-bitcoinlib.
This long post elaborates on the motivations behind the decisions that shaped the library and v1.0.0 release in particular, and also has some code examples.
- Python >= 3.7
- libsecp256k1
- libbitcoinconsensus (optional, for consensus-compatible script verification)
Tests use the following libsecp256k1 version:
v0.4.0
Libsecp256k1 is not linked as a git submodule in python-bitcointx git repository, because python-bitcointx can still be used with other versions of libsecp256k1 as long as experimental modules with unstable ABI of are not used, or are compatible with the vesion listed above.
While allowing dynamic linkage with libsecp256k1 adds these complications, it is at the same time allows more flexibility for advanced uses. For example, one can use libsecp256k1-zkp instead of libsecp256k1 to have access to zero-knowledge-proof related functions, as is done by python-elementstx package.
For best results, use the version listed above, as it is the version that python-bitcointx automatic tests
use to build libsecp256k1. Then make sure that this version of the library is loaded by python-bitcointx,
by using bitcointx.set_custom_secp256k1_path()
or LD_LIBRARY_PATH
environment variable.
$ pip install python-bitcointx
$ pipenv install python-bitcointx
$ poetry add python-bitcointx
Everything consensus critical is found in the modules under bitcointx.core. This rule is followed pretty strictly, for instance chain parameters are split into consensus critical and non-consensus-critical.
bitcointx.core - Basic core definitions, datastructures, and
(context-independent) validation
bitcointx.core.key - ECC keys, BIP32Paths
bitcointx.core.script - Scripts and opcodes
bitcointx.core.scripteval - Script evaluation/verification
bitcointx.core.psbt - BIP174 Partially-signed transactions
bitcointx.core.serialize - Serialization
bitcointx.core.secp256k1 - functions to interface with secp256k1 C library
(Note: to safely use it, experience with C
and understanting of python-C interop is a must)
bitcointx.core.sha256 - (Slow) python implementation of SHA256,
but with ability to get SHA256 mid-state
bitcointx.core.bitcoinconsensus
- ctypes wrapping code for libbitcoinconsensus script
verification function, with interface compatible
with VerifyScript from bitcointx.core.scripteval
Note that this code does not aim to be fully consensus-compatible with current bitcoin core codebase. Corner cases that is not relevant to creating valid bitcoin transactions is unlikely to be considered. See also note on VerifyScript usage below.
Non-consensus critical modules include the following:
bitcointx - Chain selection
bitcointx.base58 - Base58 encoding
bitcointx.bech32 - Bech32 encoding
bitcointx.rpc - Bitcoin Core RPC interface support
bitcointx.wallet - Wallet-related code, currently Bitcoin address and
private key support
bitcointx.util - various code-related utitlity classes and functions
Effort has been made to follow the Satoshi source relatively closely, for instance Python code and classes that duplicate the functionality of corresponding Satoshi C++ code uses the same naming conventions: CTransaction, CPubKey, nValue etc. Otherwise Python naming conventions are followed.
Like the Bitcoin Core codebase CTransaction is immutable and CMutableTransaction is mutable; unlike the Bitcoin Core codebase this distinction also applies to COutPoint, CTxIn, CTxOut and CTxWitness.
Rather confusingly Bitcoin Core shows transaction and block hashes as little-endian hex rather than the big-endian the rest of the world uses for SHA256. python-bitcointx provides the convenience functions x() and lx() in bitcointx.core to convert from big-endian and little-endian hex to raw bytes to accomodate this. In addition see b2x() and b2lx() for conversion from bytes to big/little-endian hex.
Note: only public API changes is listed here
CBitcoinAddress(<testnet_or_regtest_address>)
won't work: you will need to useCCoinAddress
(universal, the class of returned instance depends on current chain params), orCBitcoinTestnetAddress
/CBitcoinRegtestAddress
directly.CBitcoinAddress
is used only for Bitcoin mainnet addresses.rpc.Proxy
removed,rpc.RPCCaller
added (same as oldrpc.RawProxy
, butbtc_conf_file
kwarg renamed to justconf_file
). If old rpc.Proxy functionality is desired, it should be implemented as a separate library.CTransaction
default version changed to 2CPubKey.is_valid
,CPubKey.is_fullyvalid
andCPubKey.is_compressed
should now be called as methods:pub.is_valid()
, notpub.is_valid
.CPubKey.is_valid()
is also deprecated, andCPubKey.is_nonempty()
should be used instead, to avoid possible confusionis_valid()
/is_fullyvalid()
.CBitcoinAddressError
is removed,CCoinAddressError
should be used instead- Chain params for bitcoin is renamed, instead of 'mainnet', 'testnet', 'regtest' it is now 'bitcoin', 'bitcoin/testnet', 'bitcoin/mainnet'
CBech32Data.from_bytes
- changed arg order, witver is now kwargCTxWitness
is now immutable,CMutableTxWitness
is added.- If mutable components supplied to CTransaction, they will be internally converted to immutable, and vise versa with CMutableTransaction
- string representations (returned by
repr
andstr
) of various objects will often differ from that of python-bitcoinlib's. COIN
,MAX_MONEY
, etc. moved toCoreCoinParams
class, that can be subclassed and will be dispatched similar toCTransaction
and friends. It is recommended to useMoneyRange()
andcoins_to_satoshi()
,satoshi_to_coins()
functions. The two former functions will also raise ValueError if supplied/returned value is outside of MoneyRange. (unlesscheck_range=False
is passed)MoneyRange()
function does not acceptparams=
argument anymore. To get money range for different params, you can usewith ChainParams():
.
VerifyScript()
in bitcointx.core.scripteval
is (incomplete) python implementation
of Bitcoin script interpreter. It may be useful for debugging purposes.
But! Bitcoin Core should always remain the authoritative source on bitcoin transaction inputs validity.
If you want script verification with consensus rules, you should use libbitcoinconsensus
(https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/shared-libraries.md), available
via ConsensusVerifyScript()
in bitcointx.core.bitcoinconensus
.
But also please note that ConsensusVerifyScript()
does not check any standardness rules,
only consensus rules.
Script evaluation code of VerifyScript() is NOT in sync with Bitcoin Core code, and lacks some features. While some effort was made to make it behave closer to the code in Bitcoin Core, full compatibility is far away, and most likely will not be ever achieved.
WARNING: DO NOT rely on VerifyScript() in deciding if certain signed
transaction input is valid. In some corner cases (non-standard signature encoding,
unhandled script evaluation flags, etc) it may deem something invalid that bitcoind
would accept as valid. More importanty, it could accept something as valid
that bitcoind would deem invalid. ConsensusVerifyScript()
should be suitable for
that purpose, as it is just a thin wrapper over the C library libbitcoinconsensus
.
While not always good style, it's often convenient for quick scripts if
import *
can be used. To support that all the modules have __all__
defined
appropriately.
See examples/
directory. For instance this example creates a transaction
spending a pay-to-script-hash transaction output:
$ PYTHONPATH=. examples/spend-pay-to-script-hash-txout.py
<hex-encoded transaction>
Do the following:
import bitcointx
bitcointx.select_chain_params(NAME)
Where NAME is one of 'bitcoin', 'bitcoin/testnet', or 'bitcoin/regtest'.
The chain parameters currently selected is a thread-local variable that changes
behavior everywhere. If you need to change the parameters temporary, you can use
ChainParams
context manager. To get current chain params, you can use
get_current_chain_params()
:
from bitcointx import ChainParams
with ChainParams('bitcoin/testnet') as params:
print(f"{params.readable_name} params ({params.name}) are in effect")
will print
Bitcoin testnet params (bitcoin/testnet) are in effect
Sphinx documentation is in the "doc" subdirectory. Run "make help" from there to see how to build. You will need the Python "sphinx" package installed.
Currently this is just API documentation generated from the code and docstrings. Higher level written docs would be useful, perhaps starting with much of this README. Pages are written in reStructuredText and linked from index.rst.