-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update on the metadata episode, first draft of introduction & setup #52
Changes from 4 commits
be6074a
5071a71
7962664
95be7b0
7581dfc
3855794
4e6afc6
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,15 +1,48 @@ | ||
--- | ||
title: "Introduction" | ||
teaching: 0 | ||
teaching: 10 | ||
exercises: 0 | ||
questions: | ||
- "Key question" | ||
- "Why are best practices necessary in research software?" | ||
- "How Open Source can help with better quality of software?" | ||
objectives: | ||
- "First objective." | ||
- "Basics of Open Science in research software" | ||
- "Introduction to the FAIR principles" | ||
keypoints: | ||
- "First key point." | ||
- "Best practices in research software are tied to the FAIR principles" | ||
- "They are not tailored to software developers, but rather to a wider audience" | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Not sure whether "they" here refers to the best practices or the FAIR principles. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I've addressed this with a new commit. |
||
--- | ||
|
||
Scientific research relies on computer software, yet software is not always developed following practices that ensure its quality and sustainability. One of the most recent publications ([Four simple recommendations to encourage best practices in research software](https://f1000research.com/articles/6-876/v1)) provided a simple, yet robust framework of simple recommendations that encourage the adoption of existing best practices in developing research software. These recommendations are designed around Open Science values, and provide practical suggestions that contribute to making research software and its source code more discoverable, reusable and transparent. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. "Scientific research relies on computer software" Do you mean it relies on regular software development practices? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Rephrased to better reflect the original intention. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. "One of the most recent publications" I would suggest to omit "most". There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I've addressed this with a new commit. |
||
|
||
Based on these recommendations, this lesson focuses on providing both the underlying context as well as some practical exercises towards establishing their usefulness in the long term. The consequent episodes of this lesson are structured in the form of one episode per recommendation; | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Colon rather than semi-colon at the end of this paragraph? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Fixed in the new commit. |
||
1. Make source code publicly accessible from day one | ||
2. Make software easy to discover by providing software metadata via a popular community registry | ||
3. Adopt a license and comply with the license of third-party dependencies | ||
4. Define clear and transparent contribution, governance and communication processes | ||
|
||
## Open Science | ||
|
||
"_When all researchers are aware of Open Science, and are trained, supported and guided at all career stages to practice Open Science, the potential is there to fundamentally change the way research is performed and disseminated, fostering a scientific ecosystem in which research gains increased visibility, is shared more efficiently, and is performed with enhanced research integrity._" [Open Science Skills Working Group Report (2017)](https://ec.europa.eu/research/openscience/pdf/os_skills_wgreport_final.pdf#view=fit&pagemode=none) | ||
|
||
Discussing best practices in developing research software, one is bound to touch on the subject of Open Science. Modern research relies on software, and building upon—or reproducing—that research requires access to the full source code behind that software ([ref](https://open-science-training-handbook.gitbook.io)). Sharing software used for research (whether computational in nature, or that relies on any software-based analysis/interpretation) is a necessary, though not sufficient, condition for reproducibility. In addition to reproducibility, sharing software openly allows developers to receive career credit for their efforts, either through direct citation or via published software articles. We are going to be discussing all these aspects in the following lesson. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. upon-or? Not sure if should be upon -or (long dash there) There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Fixed in the new commit |
||
|
||
## FAIR principles | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I suggest to make explicit the relation between the 4OSS and FAIR, otherwise is kind of disconnected There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Fixed in the new commit. |
||
|
||
The FAIR principles are a set of community-developed guidelines to ensure that data or any digital object are Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reproducible. The FAIR principles specifically emphasize enhancing the ability of machines to automatically find and use data or any digital object, and support its reuse by individuals. Standards for the description, interoperability, citation etc. are at the core of these principles ([ref](https://www.incf.org/activities/standards-and-best-practices/what-is-fair)). | ||
|
||
The FAIR Guiding Principles, as described in [Scientific Data by Wilkinson et al](https://www.nature.com/articles/sdata201618): | ||
- To be **Findable** | ||
- To be **Accessible** | ||
- To be **Interoperable** | ||
- To be **Reusable** | ||
|
||
## Why best practices in research software | ||
|
||
There are many best practices currently in place that directly aim and are tailored for software developers. These includes aspects such as test-first programing and test coverage ([ref](https://github.com/r-lib/covr)), code quality ([ref](https://qaas.cyclopt.com/)), continuous integration ([ref](https://travis-ci.org)), etc. Unlike many software development best practices, this lesson aims to target a wider audience, particularly research funders, research institutions, journals, group leaders, and managers of projects producing research software. The adoption of these recommendations offer a simple mechanism for these stakeholders to promote the development of better software and an opportunity for developers to improve and showcase their software development skills. | ||
|
||
## Starting with a challenge | ||
|
||
> ## Challenge: Create a project on GitHub | ||
> - make sure that you have a GitHub account | ||
> - click "+ -> new repository" | ||
|
@@ -20,4 +53,4 @@ keypoints: | |
> | ||
{: .challenge} | ||
|
||
- congratulations! you've created your first repository :) | ||
Congratulations, you've created your first repository! This is the first step towards making your source code publicly accessible from day one. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
FAIR principles are related to metadata, I suggest to add a key question about the role played by metadata in research software
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Given that this introduction is for all four of the best practices, I think that it may be too specific to have a question just for metadata. Thoughts?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Totally agree, you are right, no need to add anything here