Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BUG] Extension syntax in flavor naming standard misleading #363

Closed
anjastrunk opened this issue Oct 20, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #364
Closed

[BUG] Extension syntax in flavor naming standard misleading #363

anjastrunk opened this issue Oct 20, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #364
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working SCS-VP10 Related to tender lot SCS-VP10

Comments

@anjastrunk
Copy link
Contributor

SCS standard for Server Flavors does not dictate to use suffix for CPU generation always in conjunction with suffix for CPU vendor. As it doesn't makes sense to use suffix for CPU generation without suffix of CPU vendor, SCS Flavor Standard should forbid this explicitly.

@anjastrunk anjastrunk added the bug Something isn't working label Oct 20, 2023
@anjastrunk anjastrunk self-assigned this Oct 20, 2023
@anjastrunk anjastrunk added the SCS-VP10 Related to tender lot SCS-VP10 label Oct 20, 2023
@anjastrunk anjastrunk linked a pull request Oct 20, 2023 that will close this issue
@mbuechse
Copy link
Contributor

mbuechse commented Nov 2, 2023

It turns out that the standard is merely hard to figure out correctly because the extensions syntax scheme uses brackets unevenly and in the subsections for the individual extensions the corresponding part of the syntax is not repeated. The PR will fix that. I will edit the title of this issue accordingly.

@mbuechse mbuechse changed the title [BUG] SCS Flavor Standard does not forbid using CPU generation without specifying CPU vendor [BUG] Extension syntax in flavor naming standard misleading Nov 2, 2023
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Backlog to Done in Sovereign Cloud Stack Nov 3, 2023
@anjastrunk anjastrunk mentioned this issue Apr 15, 2024
59 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working SCS-VP10 Related to tender lot SCS-VP10
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants