-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
upcloud post #166
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
upcloud post #166
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request includes changes across styling, server comparison logic, and documentation. The article styling file has been updated to adjust list item formatting. In the server comparison module, one Azure server entry was removed and several UpCloud server entries were added across various performance categories. Additionally, two markdown articles had their metadata updated by adding a new tag, "vendor," and a new markdown file was created documenting the integration of UpCloud server offerings into the Spare Cores ecosystem. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant U as User
participant SC as Spare Cores Platform
participant UA as UpCloud API
participant DP as Data Pipeline
participant PT as Pulumi Templates
participant BS as Benchmarking Service
U->>SC: Initiate UpCloud server integration
SC->>UA: Request server SKUs
UA-->>SC: Return server list
SC->>DP: Start monitoring server types
DP-->>SC: Send performance data
SC->>PT: Trigger server provisioning
PT-->>SC: Confirm setup
SC->>BS: Begin benchmarking process
BS-->>SC: Report performance metrics
SC-->>U: Present updated server offerings
Suggested reviewers
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for creative-choux-a3c817 ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/assets/articles/upcloud-servers.md (2)
1-13
: Consider style improvements in the metadata.The metadata is well-structured, but consider these style improvements:
- Use "multi-core" instead of "multi-core" for consistency.
131-131
: Consider style improvements in the content.Consider these style improvements:
- Replace "very good" with a more specific descriptor like "excellent" or "outstanding".
- Consider removing "First of all" as it's often redundant.
Also applies to: 162-162
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~131-~131: As an alternative to the over-used intensifier ‘very’, consider replacing this phrase.
Context: .... However, the Cloud Native plans offer a very good performance/price ratio, especially in ...(EN_WEAK_ADJECTIVE)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
src/app/pages/article/article.component.scss
(1 hunks)src/app/pages/server-compare/special-compares.js
(5 hunks)src/assets/articles/hetzner-new-cx-servers.md
(1 hunks)src/assets/articles/spot-instance-terminate-rates-per-az.md
(1 hunks)src/assets/articles/upcloud-servers.md
(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- src/assets/articles/hetzner-new-cx-servers.md
- src/assets/articles/spot-instance-terminate-rates-per-az.md
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
src/assets/articles/upcloud-servers.md
[misspelling] ~86-~86: This word is normally spelled as one.
Context: ...ory configurations. For example, in the multi-core Geekbench benchmarks: <iframe src="...
(EN_COMPOUNDS_MULTI_CORE)
[misspelling] ~127-~127: This word is normally spelled as one.
Context: ...pdated our comparison lists of the best multi-core and single-core performance servers on ...
(EN_COMPOUNDS_MULTI_CORE)
[style] ~131-~131: As an alternative to the over-used intensifier ‘very’, consider replacing this phrase.
Context: .... However, the Cloud Native plans offer a very good performance/price ratio, especially in ...
(EN_WEAK_ADJECTIVE)
[style] ~162-~162: Often, this adverbial phrase is redundant. Consider using an alternative.
Context: ...specific workloads. ## Final Thoughts First of all, we are grateful to UpCloud for their s...
(FIRST_OF_ALL)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
- GitHub Check: Redirect rules - creative-choux-a3c817
- GitHub Check: Header rules - creative-choux-a3c817
- GitHub Check: Pages changed - creative-choux-a3c817
- GitHub Check: cypress-run
🔇 Additional comments (6)
src/app/pages/server-compare/special-compares.js (5)
69-73
: LGTM!The addition of the UpCloud server
CLOUDNATIVE-2xCPU-4GB
to the best multi-core performance category aligns with the benchmarks discussed in the article.
111-115
: LGTM!The addition of the UpCloud server
4xCPU-8GB
to the best multi-core performance category aligns with the benchmarks discussed in the article.
153-157
: LGTM!The addition of the UpCloud server
CLOUDNATIVE-8xCPU-32GB
to the best multi-core performance category aligns with the benchmarks discussed in the article.
195-199
: LGTM!The addition of the UpCloud server
CLOUDNATIVE-16xCPU-64GB
to the best multi-core performance category aligns with the benchmarks discussed in the article.
272-276
: LGTM!The addition of the UpCloud server
CLOUDNATIVE-2xCPU-4GB
to the best single-core performance category aligns with the benchmarks discussed in the article.src/app/pages/article/article.component.scss (1)
31-41
: LGTM!The changes improve list styling by:
- Using appropriate list styles for ordered and unordered lists.
- Maintaining consistent spacing.
Summary by CodeRabbit