Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

upcloud post #166

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

upcloud post #166

wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

daroczig
Copy link
Member

@daroczig daroczig commented Feb 7, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Style
    • Updated article content styling to clearly differentiate between ordered and unordered lists.
  • New Features
    • Enhanced performance comparisons by refreshing provider selections with additional vendor options.
  • Documentation
    • Improved article metadata for better tagging and discoverability.
    • Introduced a new in-depth guide detailing the integration and performance benchmarking of new server offerings.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 7, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request includes changes across styling, server comparison logic, and documentation. The article styling file has been updated to adjust list item formatting. In the server comparison module, one Azure server entry was removed and several UpCloud server entries were added across various performance categories. Additionally, two markdown articles had their metadata updated by adding a new tag, "vendor," and a new markdown file was created documenting the integration of UpCloud server offerings into the Spare Cores ecosystem.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
src/app/pages/article/…/article.component.scss Added new styling rules for unordered (ul li → list-disc) and ordered (ol li → list-decimal) list items; updated existing li rule by removing @apply list-disc ml-4 while retaining other text styling.
src/app/pages/server-compare/…/special-compares.js Removed the Azure “Standard_D2ps_v5” entry and added several UpCloud server entries across multiple performance categories (2, 4, 8, 16 vCPUs and best single-core).
src/assets/articles/hetzner-new-cx-servers.md
src/assets/articles/spot-instance-terminate-rates-per-az.md
Updated metadata in both articles to include an additional “vendor” tag in the tags array.
src/assets/articles/upcloud-servers.md New markdown file added that details the integration of UpCloud server offerings, including API interactions, data pipeline setup, provisioning via Pulumi templates, and benchmarking.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant U as User
    participant SC as Spare Cores Platform
    participant UA as UpCloud API
    participant DP as Data Pipeline
    participant PT as Pulumi Templates
    participant BS as Benchmarking Service

    U->>SC: Initiate UpCloud server integration
    SC->>UA: Request server SKUs
    UA-->>SC: Return server list
    SC->>DP: Start monitoring server types
    DP-->>SC: Send performance data
    SC->>PT: Trigger server provisioning
    PT-->>SC: Confirm setup
    SC->>BS: Begin benchmarking process
    BS-->>SC: Report performance metrics
    SC-->>U: Present updated server offerings
Loading

Suggested reviewers

  • Palabola
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Feb 7, 2025

Deploy Preview for creative-choux-a3c817 ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit ec6ed80
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/creative-choux-a3c817/deploys/67a625fac8fe070008464e54
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-166--creative-choux-a3c817.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/assets/articles/upcloud-servers.md (2)

1-13: Consider style improvements in the metadata.

The metadata is well-structured, but consider these style improvements:

  • Use "multi-core" instead of "multi-core" for consistency.

131-131: Consider style improvements in the content.

Consider these style improvements:

  • Replace "very good" with a more specific descriptor like "excellent" or "outstanding".
  • Consider removing "First of all" as it's often redundant.

Also applies to: 162-162

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[style] ~131-~131: As an alternative to the over-used intensifier ‘very’, consider replacing this phrase.
Context: .... However, the Cloud Native plans offer a very good performance/price ratio, especially in ...

(EN_WEAK_ADJECTIVE)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d1d73b7 and ec6ed80.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • src/app/pages/article/article.component.scss (1 hunks)
  • src/app/pages/server-compare/special-compares.js (5 hunks)
  • src/assets/articles/hetzner-new-cx-servers.md (1 hunks)
  • src/assets/articles/spot-instance-terminate-rates-per-az.md (1 hunks)
  • src/assets/articles/upcloud-servers.md (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • src/assets/articles/hetzner-new-cx-servers.md
  • src/assets/articles/spot-instance-terminate-rates-per-az.md
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
src/assets/articles/upcloud-servers.md

[misspelling] ~86-~86: This word is normally spelled as one.
Context: ...ory configurations. For example, in the multi-core Geekbench benchmarks: <iframe src="...

(EN_COMPOUNDS_MULTI_CORE)


[misspelling] ~127-~127: This word is normally spelled as one.
Context: ...pdated our comparison lists of the best multi-core and single-core performance servers on ...

(EN_COMPOUNDS_MULTI_CORE)


[style] ~131-~131: As an alternative to the over-used intensifier ‘very’, consider replacing this phrase.
Context: .... However, the Cloud Native plans offer a very good performance/price ratio, especially in ...

(EN_WEAK_ADJECTIVE)


[style] ~162-~162: Often, this adverbial phrase is redundant. Consider using an alternative.
Context: ...specific workloads. ## Final Thoughts First of all, we are grateful to UpCloud for their s...

(FIRST_OF_ALL)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
  • GitHub Check: Redirect rules - creative-choux-a3c817
  • GitHub Check: Header rules - creative-choux-a3c817
  • GitHub Check: Pages changed - creative-choux-a3c817
  • GitHub Check: cypress-run
🔇 Additional comments (6)
src/app/pages/server-compare/special-compares.js (5)

69-73: LGTM!

The addition of the UpCloud server CLOUDNATIVE-2xCPU-4GB to the best multi-core performance category aligns with the benchmarks discussed in the article.


111-115: LGTM!

The addition of the UpCloud server 4xCPU-8GB to the best multi-core performance category aligns with the benchmarks discussed in the article.


153-157: LGTM!

The addition of the UpCloud server CLOUDNATIVE-8xCPU-32GB to the best multi-core performance category aligns with the benchmarks discussed in the article.


195-199: LGTM!

The addition of the UpCloud server CLOUDNATIVE-16xCPU-64GB to the best multi-core performance category aligns with the benchmarks discussed in the article.


272-276: LGTM!

The addition of the UpCloud server CLOUDNATIVE-2xCPU-4GB to the best single-core performance category aligns with the benchmarks discussed in the article.

src/app/pages/article/article.component.scss (1)

31-41: LGTM!

The changes improve list styling by:

  • Using appropriate list styles for ordered and unordered lists.
  • Maintaining consistent spacing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant