Update dependencies #196
Update dependencies #196
Conversation
|
WalkthroughThe pull request includes modifications to three files: Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🔇 Additional comments (4)package.json (4)
Critical: Security vulnerabilities in dependencies Several critical security issues remain in the updated dependencies:
Please update to the minimum secure versions: - "dompurify": "^3.2.2",
+ "dompurify": "^3.1.3",
- "vite": "^5.4.11",
+ "vite": "^5.1.8",Also applies to: 57-57, 82-82
The addition of an upper bound ( Let's verify the Node.js version compatibility: ✅ Verification successfulNode.js version constraint is correctly set and compatible with the current environment The current Node.js version (v22.9.0) falls within the specified constraint range of ">=20 <23", confirming that the version constraint is appropriate and working as intended. 🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Check if the current Node.js version in the CI environment matches the constraints
node -v | grep -E "v2[0-2]\."
Length of output: 39
The minor version bumps across development dependencies follow good maintenance practices. Let's check for any breaking changes in the updates: Also applies to: 58-58, 67-71, 77-77, 79-79, 81-81, 83-84 ✅ Verification successfulMinor version updates are safe to proceed Looking at the package versions in package.json:
All updates are minor version changes (indicated by the middle number in semver) and use caret (^) versioning which ensures backward compatibility. These changes follow semantic versioning principles where minor versions only add functionality in a backward-compatible manner. 🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Check changelogs for breaking changes
for pkg in "playwright" "eslint" "postcss" "prettier" "tailwindcss" "vitest"; do
echo "Checking $pkg changelog..."
gh api repos/$pkg/$pkg/releases/latest --jq '.body' | grep -i "breaking"
done
Length of output: 1423 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to check the package versions and their changes
# First, let's get the exact version changes from package.json
rg -A1 '"dependencies"|"devDependencies"' package.json
# Then let's check if there are any major version changes by looking at the version numbers
cat package.json | jq -r '.dependencies,.devDependencies | to_entries[] | "\(.key): \(.value)"' | grep -E "@playwright/test|eslint|postcss|prettier|tailwindcss|vitest"
Length of output: 333 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's try one more time with a simpler approach to read package.json
cat package.json
Length of output: 2703
The downgrade from Svelte 5 (beta) to Svelte 4 (stable) and its corresponding plugin is a good decision to resolve the reported installation and build issues. Let's verify the compatibility between these versions: Also applies to: 76-76 ✅ Verification successfulStrategic downgrade verified as compatible The downgrade from Svelte 5 (beta) to Svelte 4.2.19 and @sveltejs/vite-plugin-svelte to 3.1.2 is verified as compatible based on:
🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Check for any known compatibility issues between svelte and its plugin
rg -A 5 "svelte.*4\.2\.19|vite-plugin-svelte.*3\.1\.2" ./package-lock.json
Length of output: 136 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's check if pnpm-lock.yaml exists and verify the dependencies
fd -g "pnpm-lock.yaml" -x cat {}
# Also check if there are any other files mentioning these versions
rg -A 5 "svelte.*4\.2\.19|vite-plugin-svelte.*3\.1\.2"
Length of output: 65627 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's check the package.json to verify the dependencies and their compatibility
cat package.json
# Also check for any svelte config files that might show plugin configuration
fd -g "svelte.config.*" -x cat {}
Length of output: 3723 Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Copilot reviewed 2 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated no suggestions.
Files not reviewed (2)
- .prettierrc: Language not supported
- package.json: Language not supported
Comments skipped due to low confidence (1)
tailwind.config.ts:6
- The comment should be updated to reflect the new TypeScript type usage. Suggest changing to: /** @type {import('tailwindcss').Config} */
/** @type {import('tailwindcss').Config} */
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
.prettierrc(1 hunks)package.json(2 hunks)tailwind.config.ts(2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- .prettierrc
🔇 Additional comments (4)
tailwind.config.ts (1)
Line range hint 4-19: LGTM! Type safety improvements are well implemented.
The changes enhance type safety by:
- Adding proper type imports
- Using the
satisfiesoperator to ensure type conformance - Maintaining the same configuration while adding compile-time type checking
This is a good practice that helps catch configuration errors early.
package.json (3)
25-25: Verify Node.js version compatibility with CI/CD
The Node.js version constraint has been updated to ">=20 <23". This is more specific than before and could affect CI/CD environments.
47-85: Verify compatibility between interdependent packages
Several related packages have been updated:
@sveltejs/kit→^2.9.0@sveltejs/vite-plugin-svelte→^4.0.2vite→^5.4.11
Please ensure these versions are compatible with each other.
Additionally, some packages have significant version jumps that warrant careful testing:
dompurify→^3.2.2eslint→^9.16.0prettier→^3.4.2
77-77: Review Svelte major version update carefully
The update from svelte ^5.1.0 to ^5.6.1 is significant. Svelte 5 is still in beta, and these updates might include breaking changes.
Also applies to: 78-78
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more specific information about Svelte usage patterns that might be affected by version changes.
Based on the search results, I can now provide a final response:
Svelte 5.6.1 update appears safe for this codebase
The codebase primarily uses standard Svelte features that are stable across versions:
- Traditional component props (
export let) - Standard control flow (
{#if},{#each},{#await}) - No usage of new Svelte 5 runes (
$state,$derived,$effect) - No advanced or beta-specific syntax patterns
The update from 5.1.0 to 5.6.1 should be safe as the codebase doesn't utilize any of the new experimental features introduced in Svelte 5.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Svelte-specific syntax that might be affected
rg -l "(\$:|let:|\{#|@\w+)" src/
Length of output: 1510
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for specific Svelte 5 syntax patterns and features
# Looking for runes ($state, $derived, etc.), new control flow syntax, and component props
rg -A 2 "\$state|let \$|const \$|\$derived|\$effect|\{#each|\{#if|\{#await|export let" src/
# Also check package-lock.json for the previous version
cat package-lock.json | grep -A 5 '"svelte":'
Length of output: 8426
The dev server does not work for me as well. But it builds. We would need to update skeleton to v3 which is a huge thing. I am out of ideas to fix this. We might be able to downgrade certain dependencies. But all of this would require a deep dive into the skeleton docs (or a time consuming upgrade to v3). What's you take on this? PS: |
|
@koilebeit Can you run the current configuration on |
Yes, with the actual main it is the same problem |
|
@koilebeit I downgraded the relevant dependencies. It's still inconsistent, but less ;) |
Pull request
Proposed changes
Types of changes
Checklist
Summary by CodeRabbit
.prettierrcconfiguration file.package.json.devDependenciesfor better compatibility and performance.tailwind.config.ts.