Enforcement of customizable type constraints for DependencyBuilder

[philippzagar]

Enforcement of customizable type constraints for DependencyBuilder

♻️ Current situation & Problem

As of now, the DependencyBuilder aggregates multiple types conforming to Module towards a DependencyCollection. However, the type constraint of the DependencyBuilder currently only enables the enforcement of the Module conformance, not the conformance to other, more specific types that may be useful for implementing a Domain Specific Language.

⚙️ Release Notes

• Enable enforcement of customizable type constraints for DependencyBuilders via the newly introduced DependencyCollectionBuilder protocol

📚 Documentation

DocC docs added.

✅ Testing

--

📝 Code of Conduct & Contributing Guidelines

By submitting creating this pull request, you agree to follow our Code of Conduct and Contributing Guidelines:

• I agree to follow the Code of Conduct and Contributing Guidelines.

[philippzagar]

Thanks a lot to @Supereg for helping with the design/implementation!

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #93 (641a774) into main (092eabc) will increase coverage by 0.08%.
The diff coverage is 53.85%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #93      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   91.46%   91.53%   +0.08%     
==========================================
  Files          30       31       +1     
  Lines         655      661       +6     
==========================================
+ Hits          599      605       +6     
  Misses         56       56              

Files	Coverage Δ
Sources/Spezi/Dependencies/DependencyBuilder.swift	100.00% <ø> (+52.18%)	⬆️
...rces/Spezi/Dependencies/DependencyCollection.swift	97.30% <100.00%> (+0.24%)	⬆️
...Spezi/Dependencies/DependencyPropertyWrapper.swift	90.75% <100.00%> (+0.55%)	⬆️
Sources/Spezi/Module/ModuleBuilder.swift	100.00% <ø> (ø)
...ezi/Dependencies/DependencyCollectionBuilder.swift	40.00% <40.00%> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 092eabc...641a774. Read the comment docs.

[Supereg]

Not sure if you already expect a review, but had a chance to look at the implementation and had a small comment. So I'm already submitting that now 👍

Looks great 🚀

[philippzagar]

Thanks a lot to @Supereg for helping with the design/implementation!

Thanks for the review, didn't expect it so quickly as I wanted to write some additional test cases :D

[PSchmiedmayer]

Thank you @philippzagar for the additions and thank you for @Supereg for the support! I added two smaller comments about docs but apart from this I am happy to see the PR being merged 👍

[philippzagar]

@PSchmiedmayer Please merge the PR, small testing check is failing as the result builder default protocol implementation leads to a few patch coverage misses.