v0.29.1

This patch release fixes an issue where custom (i.e. user-created) aggregate rules¹. wouldn't work as expected when the condition for a violation was the absence of aggregated data. This could for example be a rule that says "at least one rule must be named allow, and it must have a default assignment to false".

Upgrading from v0.29.0 is not required unless you're writing custom Regal rules.

Many thanks to @shibataka000 for reporting the issue, and in such an exemplary way ⭐

Changelog

• 0c6e8ed: build(deps): bump github/codeql-action from 3.27.2 to 3.27.3 (#1258) (@dependabot[bot])
• 743a65b: Fix custom rules that report on the absence of aggregates (#1260) (@anderseknert)

1. scroll below the table of rules for an explanation of what aggregate rules are ↩