Remove triple comments in some places

validators/order.ak

@@ -30,25 +30,26 @@ validator(stake_script_hash: Hash<Blake2b_224, Script>) {
   fn spend(datum: Data, redeemer: OrderRedeemer, ctx: ScriptContext) -> Bool {
     when redeemer is {
       Cancel -> {
-        /// We only expect the datum here, to avoid any related costs in the other branch, which doesn't need it
+        // We only expect the datum here, to avoid any related costs in the other branch, which doesn't need it
         expect datum: OrderDatum = datum
-        /// Defer to sundae.multisig
+        // Defer to sundae.multisig
         multisig.satisfied(
           datum.owner,
           ctx.transaction.extra_signatories,
           ctx.transaction.validity_range,
         )
       }
       Scoop -> {
-        /// Assume that the stake_script_hash is the first withdrawal in the list
-        /// Since the ledger doesn't reorder withdrawals (TODO: confirm this!!)
-        /// If we ever have other withdrawals (for example, additional constraints enforced by a different order)
-        /// then that script can look for the appropriate one, and we can just ensure this one is first in the list.
+        // Assume that the stake_script_hash is the first withdrawal in the list
+        // Since the ledger doesn't reorder withdrawals (TODO: confirm this!!)
+        // If we ever have other withdrawals (for example, additional constraints enforced by a different order)
+        // then that script can look for the appropriate one, and we can just ensure this one is first in the list.
         expect [head] = dict.to_list(ctx.transaction.withdrawals)
         when head is {
-          /// We match against the script hash like this to ignore the withdrawal amount
-          /// TODO: we could make this more efficient by CBOR encoding the `Inline(ScriptCredential())` into the `stake_script_hash` redeemer
-          /// and just doing a direct equaltiy comparison. Since this runs for each order, this could represent significant savings!
+          // We match against the script hash like this to ignore the withdrawal amount
+          // TODO: we could make this more efficient by CBOR encoding the `Inline(ScriptCredential())` into the `stake_script_hash` parameter
+          // or perhaps even the whole withdrawal list to compare it all at once!
+          // and just doing a direct equaltiy comparison. Since this runs for each order, this could represent significant savings!
           (Inline(ScriptCredential(script)), _) -> script == stake_script_hash
           _ -> False
         }