-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 323
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixed #966 Add Named Attributes to Matrix Profile #972
Fixed #966 Add Named Attributes to Matrix Profile #972
Conversation
@NimaSarajpoor Would you mind reviewing this first draft? |
@seanlaw |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #972 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 98.93% 99.02% +0.09%
==========================================
Files 84 85 +1
Lines 14293 14413 +120
==========================================
+ Hits 14141 14273 +132
+ Misses 152 140 -12 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@seanlaw
I provided a few comments.
@NimaSarajpoor Thanks for reviewing. I have made some changes and added some comments |
@NimaSarajpoor Do you think this is ready to be merged? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@seanlaw
Sorry for the late response. It is all good. I just added a few minor comments.
@NimaSarajpoor Thanks for catching those. I've fixed them now |
@seanlaw |
Please go ahead and merge when you are satisfied with the changes 😊 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@seanlaw
I missed this one (my bad!) I am going to take care of it.
@seanlaw |
Ooh, yes! Let me think about that and what to do |
Check out this pull request on See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks. Powered by ReviewNB |
Alright, @NimaSarajpoor what do you think of the |
Frankly, I don't love how they look. I will try something else later today. Please stay tuned |
Okay, adding the
|
The box is indeed nicer. However, I initially saw the box in its un-rendered form, and I realized that I had to upgrade my notebook from 6 to 7 so that I can see the box. Are you okay with this? |
I am seeing the same thing as you on Github and I am only able to render in Jupyterlab using the Myst extension. However, I am unable to get it to render for |
I think I figured it out. The key was adding After switching to |
@NimaSarajpoor I think it is ready for review again |
That was fast! You should share how you do it 😅
I will check the changes. |
@seanlaw If most of the users go and check the tutorials available in the |
Nothing special except eventually honing in on the problem:
myst-nb docs > authoring > Jupyter notebooks > Syntax exntensions > Colon Fencing I'm sure there was a lot of branching along the way and it was very, very frustrating that I considered giving up numerous times! |
@NimaSarajpoor Thanks for catching those copy/paste typos! I am doing too much at the same time and multitasking is killing me 😄. It's actually really, really nice to have somebody else reviewing with an eye for detail so thank you! |
I had the same feeling but this is basically asking, "how do we force Github to render the .ipynb files using the myst-parser" and I am not sure. One may post a question on the I think we are at the "early adopter" problem where it will take some time before anybody can get Github to change and add I posted a
Yes, I agree. |
Thanks for sharing!! Great problem-solving skill! I think we all consider giving up from time to time.... but, eventually, we just keep going :)
Got it! Thanks for posting the question. |
@seanlaw |
Thanks, @NimaSarajpoor. It looks like all of the tests are passing except that the |
Can you let me know where I can find that? I took a look at the previous runs here: https://github.com/TDAmeritrade/stumpy/actions And, I took a look at my first attempt: But couldn't locate the 5-hour delay (maybe it was not counted when it was in progress??). As a side note: As another side note: |
It's resolved now: It was showing "In Progress" previously but the new commit seems to have fixed it
Please create a new issue for this so that it can be tracked separately
Let's handle this in a new issue as well please. Once you can confirm that you are able to reproduce the error and add it to the new issue then I will re-run the tests above so that we can close out this current issue/PR |
Please allow me some time to work on reproducing the error. I will get back to you |
I reported a similar failure in #984 |
Thank you. I am re-running the tests now. If they pass and there are no more changes, please feel free to squash and merge at your earliest convenience. |
@seanlaw |
See #966
Pull Request Checklist
Below is a simple checklist but please do not hesitate to ask for assistance!
black
(i.e.,python -m pip install black
orconda install -c conda-forge black
)flake8
(i.e.,python -m pip install flake8
orconda install -c conda-forge flake8
)pytest-cov
(i.e.,python -m pip install pytest-cov
orconda install -c conda-forge pytest-cov
)black .
in the root stumpy directoryflake8 .
in the root stumpy directory./setup.sh && ./test.sh
in the root stumpy directory