Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Stonecut GTCEU warning blocks into each other #1439

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

gamma-delta
Copy link

For parity with Chisel.

I like the textures but can't be arsed to fiddle with black and yellow dyes all day.

Copy link
Collaborator

@Xefyr0 Xefyr0 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

23 inputs x 23 outputs for all possible stonecutting recipes is a lot of new recipes for a slight improvement in QoL. 529 recipes! 1/4 of all stonecutting recipes would be hazard blocks after this change!

Perhaps it would be better to do something similar to P2Ps, where one craftable warning block can be stonecut into all of the others.

@gamma-delta
Copy link
Author

gamma-delta commented Jan 25, 2025

Ah, I can make the "root block" the solid machine casing, which you can cut to and from any warning block, would that be better?

@ThePansmith
Copy link
Owner

I feel like this would be something better directed towards GTm, as it's still getting actively updated.

But yeah for now just do what xef said.

@gamma-delta gamma-delta force-pushed the stonecut-gtceu-warning-blocks branch from 26265f7 to d13e90f Compare January 28, 2025 00:39
Copy link
Author

@gamma-delta gamma-delta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yup

Copy link
Author

@gamma-delta gamma-delta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Aha sorry I am not very good at the Github review workflow. hopefully this should review it properly?

@gamma-delta gamma-delta requested a review from Xefyr0 January 28, 2025 16:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants