Update ramping file with new attach_constraint and create new tables

[abelsiqueira]

Update ramp file with new attach_constraint, create new tables and change from groupby to loop over the entire table (to use the attach).

Depends on #963

Closes #964

[github-actions]

Benchmark Results

	d42650e...	5cbddfc...	d42650e.../5cbddfc5658e6d...
energy_problem/create_model	41.6 ± 2.2 s	40.9 ± 1.3 s	1.02
energy_problem/input_and_constructor	15.2 ± 0.098 s	14.9 ± 0.24 s	1.02
time_to_load	4.21 ± 0.15 s	4.01 ± 0.019 s	1.05

	d42650e...	5cbddfc...	d42650e.../5cbddfc5658e6d...
energy_problem/create_model	0.611 G allocs: 21 GB	0.611 G allocs: 21.3 GB	0.987
energy_problem/input_and_constructor	0.0432 G allocs: 1.69 GB	0.0432 G allocs: 1.69 GB	1
time_to_load	0.159 k allocs: 11.2 kB	0.159 k allocs: 11.2 kB	1

Benchmark Plots

A plot of the benchmark results have been uploaded as an artifact to the workflow run for this PR.
Go to "Actions"->"Benchmark a pull request"->[the most recent run]->"Artifacts" (at the bottom).

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 88.57143% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 94.85%. Comparing base (d42650e) to head (5cbddfc).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/constraints/ramping-and-unit-commitment.jl	86.20%	4 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #965      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   95.27%   94.85%   -0.43%     
==========================================
  Files          29       29              
  Lines        1059     1049      -10     
==========================================
- Hits         1009      995      -14     
- Misses         50       54       +4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[datejada]

Reviewed through peer programming

[abelsiqueira]

@datejada, this was a question I had when looking at these tables. The without_unit_commitment doesn't check for asset.unit_commitment = false or NOT asset.unit_commitment

[datejada]

Good catch! We need to add those checks in the SQL query. Thanks!

[abelsiqueira]

Done. I re-requested your review but I'm not working anymore today. If I work before our Monday meeting, I'll just merge