Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 1, 2021. It is now read-only.

Issue 166: Update error summary content #40

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 27, 2019

Conversation

sulthan-ahmed
Copy link
Contributor

As per GDS guidelines

UKHomeOfficeForms/hof#167

@jjrobothamho
Copy link

I don't have access to approve but this looks good to me.

Copy link
Contributor

@zuzak zuzak left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

on behalf of @jjrobothamho

@sulthan-ahmed
Copy link
Contributor Author

😆 nice one @zuzak

@sulthan-ahmed sulthan-ahmed merged commit ae708be into master Jun 27, 2019
@sulthan-ahmed sulthan-ahmed deleted the issue-166/error-summary-content branch June 27, 2019 11:42
@RobinKnipe
Copy link
Contributor

@sulthan-ahmed - just my .02€ worth, but that title seems a bit generic, i.e. it doesn't give an indication that the problem is with user input as opposed to a server problem.

@sulthan-ahmed
Copy link
Contributor Author

you make a good point and I agree with you @RobinKnipe The previous summary makes it a bit more obvious. One to take up in X-gov

@zuzak
Copy link
Contributor

zuzak commented Jun 27, 2019

I think the intent is that usually the user doesn't care if it's a server problem or a user input problem.
If it's a server error, chances are you aren't using the red box error summary pattern anyway.

"There's a problem" message is now acting as a signpost that something is wrong, and that it needs to be fixed: it's meant to be generic.
The actual error messages below the header should give clear, precise instructions as to how to do it regardless.

There's user research somewhere (HMRC, I think) that the old text tended to be read as blaming the user for making problems, when it's usually actually our fault for not making the correct thing to do clear enough -- which tends to raise anxiety/etc and make it more likely they'll quit the service.

GDS guidance: https://design-system.service.gov.uk/components/error-summary/

@zuzak
Copy link
Contributor

zuzak commented Jun 27, 2019

Ah, here we go: alphagov/govuk-design-system-backlog#128

@sulthan-ahmed
Copy link
Contributor Author

thanks for the explanation @zuzak

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants