Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test versioniong #1

Closed
wants to merge 24 commits into from
Closed

test versioniong #1

wants to merge 24 commits into from

Conversation

WojciechMazur
Copy link
Owner

[test_msi]

@WojciechMazur WojciechMazur force-pushed the build/improve-versioning branch from 80832a0 to 75adb2a Compare October 23, 2024 21:17
@WojciechMazur WojciechMazur deleted the build/improve-versioning branch November 6, 2024 10:25
WojciechMazur pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 17, 2025
`given ... with` or `given ... = new { ... }` kinds of definitions now follow
the old rules. This allows recursive `given...with` definitions as they are
found in protoQuill.

We still have the old check in a later phase against directly recursive methods.
Of the three loops in the original i15474 we now detect #2 and scala#3 with new new
restrictions. #1 slips through since it is a loop involving a `given...with` instance
of `Conversion`, but is caught later with the recursive method check.

Previously tests #1 and scala#3 were detected with the recursive methods check and #2 slipped
through altogether.

The new rules are enough for defining simple givens with `=` without fear of looping.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant