-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 589
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
- Loading branch information
Showing
2 changed files
with
10 additions
and
3 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ba5deb1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
AI Review for src/Util/SSLBox.cpp:
Code Review: Patch to src/Util/SSLBox.cpp
Summary
This patch introduces thread safety to the
SSL_Initor
class by adding mutex locks to various methods. This is a positive change that improves the robustness of the code.Detailed Feedback
Code Overview
The patch adds
std::lock_guard<std::recursive_mutex>
locks to the following methods in theSSL_Initor
class:loadCertificate
findCertificate
setContext
makeSSL
trustCertificate
getSSLCtxWildcards
getSSLCtx_l
defaultVhost
This ensures that these methods are thread-safe and prevent potential race conditions.
Strengths
SSL_Initor
class, making it more robust in multi-threaded environments.std::lock_guard
makes the locking mechanism explicit and easy to understand.Areas for Improvement
1. Recursive Mutex Usage
std::recursive_mutex
for locking. While this allows for recursive locking, it might be overkill in this case. If the code doesn't require recursive locking, using a standardstd::mutex
would be more efficient.std::mutex
instead ofstd::recursive_mutex
unless recursive locking is truly necessary.2. Locking Granularity
SSL_Initor
object for most methods. This might be too coarse-grained, potentially leading to unnecessary blocking.3. Documentation
Conclusion
This patch is a valuable improvement that enhances the thread safety of the
SSL_Initor
class. However, the use ofstd::recursive_mutex
and the coarse-grained locking might be unnecessary. Consider usingstd::mutex
and refining the locking granularity for better performance. Additionally, adding documentation about the changes would be beneficial.TRANS_BY_GITHUB_AI_ASSISTANT
ba5deb1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
AI Review for src/Util/SSLBox.h:
Code Review: Patch to src/Util/SSLBox.h
Summary
This patch introduces a mutex to the
SSL_Initor
class to ensure thread safety. This is a positive change that addresses a potential race condition in the original code.Detailed Feedback
Code Overview
The patch adds a
std::recursive_mutex
named_mtx
to theSSL_Initor
class. This mutex is used to protect the access to the_ctxs
,_ctxs_wildcards
,_ctx_empty
, and_default_vhost
members, which are shared between threads.Strengths
SSL_Initor
class, minimizing the impact on other parts of the codebase.Areas for Improvement
1. Mutex Usage
SSL_Initor
class. This means that the mutex is created and destroyed along with theSSL_Initor
object. However, theSSL_Initor
is a singleton, meaning that it is only created once. This could lead to unnecessary overhead if the mutex is not actually needed for the entire lifetime of the application.static std::recursive_mutex _mtx;
2. Mutex Locking
Conclusion
This patch is a positive step towards improving the thread safety of the
SSL_Initor
class. However, there are some areas for improvement related to mutex usage and locking. By addressing these points, the code can be made more efficient and easier to maintain.TRANS_BY_GITHUB_AI_ASSISTANT