You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I tried to use VerityMap to validate a diploid human genome assembly using HiFi reads, but on my data it was too slow to be practical. I let it run for >3 weeks one 16 threads, and it only mapped up to about 4x. Is this speed expected? Are there any tweaks I can make to increase it?
Another question/request: I understand from the paper that VerityMap also includes analysis modules to detect the location of misassemblies. As far as I can see, these can only be accessed after read mapping concludes (I believe the relevant code is here). Is this correct? It would be useful if the interface allowed a more modular option that could be run independently of mapping, especially since it seems like I will need to troubleshoot the mapping stage.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I tried to use VerityMap to validate a diploid human genome assembly using HiFi reads, but on my data it was too slow to be practical. I let it run for >3 weeks one 16 threads, and it only mapped up to about 4x. Is this speed expected? Are there any tweaks I can make to increase it?
The command I ran was
Another question/request: I understand from the paper that VerityMap also includes analysis modules to detect the location of misassemblies. As far as I can see, these can only be accessed after read mapping concludes (I believe the relevant code is here). Is this correct? It would be useful if the interface allowed a more modular option that could be run independently of mapping, especially since it seems like I will need to troubleshoot the mapping stage.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: