Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Correctly merge planning trees for OPTIONAL JOIN and MINUS #1777

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

RobinTF
Copy link
Collaborator

@RobinTF RobinTF commented Feb 7, 2025

Related to #1454, but does not fix the underlying issue.

For regular joins the bitmasks that indicate which filters were already applied are merged, but this wasn't the case for optional joins and minus.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 7, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 90.02%. Comparing base (551288e) to head (dba911a).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1777      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   90.04%   90.02%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         395      395              
  Lines       37909    37912       +3     
  Branches     4264     4264              
==========================================
- Hits        34136    34132       -4     
- Misses       2478     2481       +3     
- Partials     1295     1299       +4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@sparql-conformance
Copy link

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant