Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CLIENT-3264] Modify on_locking_only batch code to only write info4 byte when on_locking_only is true. #716

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 17, 2025

Conversation

juliannguyen4
Copy link
Collaborator

@juliannguyen4 juliannguyen4 commented Jan 16, 2025

"This preserves compatibility with older servers that do not support the extra info4 byte."

Build artifacts passes, valgrind shows no memory errors, massif memory usage looks ok.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 81.09%. Comparing base (26bf4b7) to head (e3ffc95).
Report is 3 commits behind head on dev.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev     #716      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   81.07%   81.09%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         102      102              
  Lines       15194    15203       +9     
==========================================
+ Hits        12319    12329      +10     
+ Misses       2875     2874       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@juliannguyen4 juliannguyen4 marked this pull request as ready for review January 17, 2025 15:46
Copy link
Contributor

@justinlee-aerospike justinlee-aerospike left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Change is good

@juliannguyen4 juliannguyen4 merged commit 63265a8 into dev Jan 17, 2025
143 of 150 checks passed
@juliannguyen4 juliannguyen4 deleted the CLIENT-3264-fix-batch-older-servers branch January 17, 2025 16:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants