Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

2023/6/30: SMCGlobal, SMCLocal and extract #110

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

2023/6/30: SMCGlobal, SMCLocal and extract #110

wants to merge 6 commits into from

Conversation

snowmantw
Copy link

@snowmantw snowmantw commented Jun 29, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Goal: define SMCGlobal, SMCLocal and SMCLang.

@snowmantw
2023/6/29: WIP: monad_model.v:2031
bc24442 
shows the difficulties to have monads in one monad? Because of the universe inconsistency issue
@snowmantw
Copy link
Author

Check StateMonad.acto (VarName -> MonadSMCLocals F P VarName).

In environment
F, P : UU0
VarName : eqType
The term "VarName -> MonadSMCLocals F P VarName" has type
 "Type@{max(Equality.type.u0,MonadSMCLocals.u0)}"
while it is expected to have type "Type@{monad_model.4448}"
(universe inconsistency: Cannot enforce MonadSMCLocals.u0 <=
monad_model.4448 because monad_model.4448 < isFunctor.axioms_.u0
<= MonadSMCLocal.axioms_.u3 <= MonadSMCLocal.type.u0 <= MonadSMCLocals.u0).

@snowmantw
2023/6/29: WIP: change Global from monad of monads to monad of data i…
8d61782 
…nstances

But how to define the `extract` method for the local monad becomes a modeling problem.
See monad_model.v:2009.
@snowmantw snowmantw changed the title 2023/6/29: WIP: monad_model.v:2031 2023/6/30: SMCGlobal, SMCLocal and extract Jun 29, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@snowmantw