W2V Smartbin Solution #11
Conversation
|
Hi! Thank you for your interest in our program! The Robonomics team has started reviewing the proposal, stay tuned. |
|
Hi! The DAO reviewed the proposal and made several comments:
After these corrections, the DAO will move on to discuss your project further. Best, |
|
Hi Ivan!
We will correct the information as soon as possible.
SmarBin devs are in the process of relocating to a safe place. It will take
us two days.
Thank you for your interest.
…On Mon, Apr 25, 2022, 16:20 Ivan Berman ***@***.***> wrote:
Hi!
The DAO reviewed the proposal and made several comments:
- Please clarify the start and end dates of the project, given that
you have set 5 months for completion.
- Section 2, Project Overview - please insert the image with the
correct link from the repository, it didn't load right now.
- There is an extra test.md file in the smart_bin_w2v folder, please
delete it.
- In the Project Schedule table, you have entered some dates that have
already passed. If this refers to already completed developments, then they
can be removed from the table. The table should indicate only a detailed
plan of work that is to be done after receiving a grant.
- The funding in the Requested Funding field does not match what you
entered in Project Budget. Could you fix this moment?
After these corrections, the DAO will move on to discuss your project
further.
Best,
Ivan
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#11 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AUBZWYFHOMRWMDYVWED3NADVG2L27ANCNFSM5TFYFNVA>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
|
Hi @Fingerling42 |
|
Hi @Geri-X We discussed your project and the team liked the idea of plastic recycling tokenization. As we understand, you want to assemble one smart bin prototype, and in principle, you already have all the schemes for this. But my colleagues had questions about the budget and about the details of the planned work. Mainly, we give grants for research projects (often teams from universities) or projects doing proof-of-concept. The assembly and testing of smart bin with blockchainization fits into this. But in your budget, 30% of the grant is allocated for marketing, and the team does not understand the scope of tasks and the expected results that are supposed to be obtained for it. For example, do you want to showcase your prototype somewhere (maybe malls, exhibitions, universities)? Or maybe you want to participate in some PR events, conferences? All this is worth describing in “Expected results”, and also disclosed in “Project Schedule”. Also, the items “Software for recycling center” and “Blockchain integration” also lack additional detail about the planned tasks, at least approximately, for example, an architectural diagram of software components. Unfortunately, the main problem is that due to internal changes in our project last month, we were forced to suspend the grant program, at least until the end of the summer. Considering that the proposal needs to be improved and that we would not like to lose contact with your project, we can proceed as follows. If at the beginning of September 2022, the grant is still relevant to you, we can return to reviewing your proposal again. Please let me know what you think about this. Best, |
|
Hi @Fingerling42 |
No description provided.