Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

✅ Address deepsource concern #1147

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 4, 2025
Merged

✅ Address deepsource concern #1147

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 4, 2025

Conversation

akrherz
Copy link
Owner

@akrherz akrherz commented Mar 4, 2025

No description provided.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

The pull request addresses a deepsource concern by changing == to === in a JavaScript file. This is a good change to improve code quality and prevent potential issues with type coercion.

Summary of Findings

  • Equality Comparison: The change from == to === ensures strict equality comparison, which is generally preferred in JavaScript to avoid unexpected type coercion issues.

Merge Readiness

The pull request is a small but important fix. The change from == to === improves code quality and reduces the risk of unexpected behavior due to type coercion. I recommend merging this pull request after verifying that the change does not introduce any regressions. I am unable to directly approve this pull request, and users should have others review and approve this code before merging.

Copy link

deepsource-io bot commented Mar 4, 2025

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits 211a1d2..2d4d2fd. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

AnalyzerStatusSummaryLink
DeepSource Shell LogoShell✅ SuccessView Check ↗
DeepSource JavaScript LogoJavaScript❌ Failure
❗ 16 occurences introduced
View Check ↗
DeepSource Python LogoPython✅ SuccessView Check ↗
DeepSource PHP LogoPHP✅ SuccessView Check ↗

💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.02%. Comparing base (211a1d2) to head (2d4d2fd).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1147   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   89.02%   89.02%           
=======================================
  Files         409      409           
  Lines       31314    31314           
=======================================
  Hits        27876    27876           
  Misses       3438     3438           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@akrherz akrherz merged commit 712f387 into main Mar 4, 2025
11 of 12 checks passed
@akrherz akrherz deleted the 240304-2 branch March 4, 2025 18:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants