Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

idea for redoing the transfer function editor #131

Closed
Tracked by #193 ...
toloudis opened this issue Apr 5, 2023 · 4 comments
Closed
Tracked by #193 ...

idea for redoing the transfer function editor #131

toloudis opened this issue Apr 5, 2023 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@toloudis
Copy link
Contributor

toloudis commented Apr 5, 2023

Background

#79
We have per-channel controls that may be excessively complicated for our users.

User needs statement(s)

As a microscopist or cell biologist who needs to inspect raw images, I need quick and easy contrast adjustment controls.

Size

m

Requirements

I have a specific idea in mind that I want to put down in writing here.
User research has shown that users typically only need to set the "min" and "max" for intensity remapping and rarely (possibly never) will need anything more complicated. I propose making the histogram control smaller and simpler:

  • always only 2 control points showing and users can move only those points.
  • (perhaps an "advanced" mode where user can add control points? not sure if needed)
  • add a menu of color maps, and the ability to create a custom color map. The color map would be applied between max and min. A color map is basically just a color gradient. (example: https://docs.paraview.org/en/v5.10.0/_images/ColorMapComboBox.png)
  • we still want to preserve "colorize" mode but this might be achievable with just a color map.
  • does applying a color map override the single-color per channel? currently this is used as a multiplier, with an alpha slider to control how much it contributes

Deliverables

TBD

Stakeholder(s)

@toloudis @frasercl @lynwilhelm (should add at least one imaging user)

Timeline

TBD

Notes

@frasercl
Copy link
Contributor

Captured by/included in #80 - resolve when it resolves

@frasercl
Copy link
Contributor

@toloudis confirming: #294 resolves this? There's at least one feature idea here (a color map menu) that isn't included in that.

@toloudis
Copy link
Contributor Author

@toloudis confirming: #294 resolves this? There's at least one feature idea here (a color map menu) that isn't included in that.

Yes, we can just call this completed. My intention was to somehow preserve an "easy" way to make a color gradient from min to max. We can make a new "idea/suggestion" ticket for it or something

@frasercl
Copy link
Contributor

Remaining unimplemented suggestion captured in #315. Closing this now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants