Use webpack.common.js instead of webpack.dev.js for deployments

[ShrimpCryptid]

Use Case

Currently, GH and S3 builds rely on webpack.dev.js (instead of webpack.common.js). Switch them to use webpack.common.js instead to avoid unintended consequences if editing the dev server?

    "start": "webpack serve --config webpack.dev.js  --env env=dev",
    "gh-build-nightly": "webpack --config webpack.dev.js --env env=production basename=/website-3d-cell-viewer",
    "gh-build-release": "webpack --config webpack.dev.js --env env=production basename=/website-3d-cell-viewer-release",
    "s3-build": "webpack --config webpack.dev.js --env env=production",

Solution

Please describe your ideal solution

Alternatives

Please describe any alternatives you've considered, even if you've dismissed them

[toloudis]

Just wondering - does this mean we don't need both and can consolidate into just one webpack config file? (aka webpack.config.js) (Tangential idea: switch to vite)

[ShrimpCryptid]

I think we do still need the webpack.dev.js config to enable route management when running the local dev server? But I think that's the only case where we'd need it.

@ switching to vite: hell yeah 😎

[ShrimpCryptid]

Actually yes, I think you're right. We can probably move that setting to the default webpack server, and it would just not do anything for all the built versions of w3cv.

[toloudis]

see #324 might resolve this...?