Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fetch docs with git clone instead of GitHub API #4000
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Fetch docs with git clone instead of GitHub API #4000
Changes from 2 commits
7e2ed3f
c1fe955
828c4e5
594fa50
ee6af08
b4eb65b
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we could give this parameter a better name:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think you'll need to add
require "pathname"
on line 3 to use this.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm, you only use
docs_path_with_extension
to formdocs_path_without_extension
. I think we can cut out the middle-man and set all the variables we need up front a bit more cleanly:NB there's also no need for the
relative
variable anymore, we've already definedrelative_path
above, which you can refer to on line 104.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nitpick: I'd rename your
relative
andurl
variables torelative_path
andsource_url
. Then the above two lines can be reduced to:Should be easier to follow, as there are fewer keys/variable names to keep track of.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Very glad to see this method go - thank you for improving the tests! ⭐
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The contents of this file aren't under test, as far as I can see. I think we can just empty the file (or replace the contents with just a string like "placeholder text"). This will make it clearer to devs that the two spec fixture files don't need to be kept in sync.