forked from solana-labs/solana
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 239
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update SlotHashesSysvar
API for more flexibility
#1948
Closed
Closed
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2b814be
make `get_pod_slot_hashes` public
buffalojoec f347d25
use length of slot hashes sysvar
buffalojoec fadfaeb
update tests
buffalojoec 9f675e0
redesign to use one syscall
buffalojoec eda2322
rename to `pod_slot_hashes`
buffalojoec 2d1b856
rename back to `get_pod_slot_hashes`
buffalojoec 8c356db
review feedback
buffalojoec 3bf3e44
refactor to hang onto buffer
buffalojoec dea2a49
rename `get_pod_slot_hashes` to `as_slice`
buffalojoec b43cb0a
make fields
buffalojoec File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These, along with the addition of fields to the struct, are breaking changes. Do you plan to break and backport the breaking change? We're still doing a little bit of that, and since it's a new API, it should be OK if that's how you want to go.
If that's the case, how about making
SlotHashesSysvar
implement theSysvar
trait forget()
, and then add the other functions as before?Or, we could avoid a breaking change by creating a new
PodSlotHashes
struct and deprecate the old one, which would make a nice analogue to the normalSlotHashes
. What do you think?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this is probably the better way to go. We can deprecate
SlotHashesSysvar
and add aPodSlotHashes
that implementsSysvar
and offers a similar API toSlotHashes
. Nice idea!I think it maybe makes more sense at this point to open a new PR where I can add the deprecation and new struct/API. Work for you?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No problem, whatever you prefer!