You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this change makes using the typing trainer harder and a bit distracting, because of the different alignement of the first words of each line. In the end, it gives jumping to the next line a bit more of unneccessary friction. Thats in addition the friction thats already there, because it is a line break and you have to move your eyes all over the place. With the centered text the anticipated spot where to look for the next word is no longer valid, which makes the transition slower.
If would suggest to roll back this change, because the little improvement in style does not justify the sacrifices in ergonomics.
One could think about an opt-in setting to enable different kinds of text alignement, for users that wish to do so nevertheless. However using text-align: start; as default setting would be benefical for most of the users due to the stated reasons.
5e656e3
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this change makes using the typing trainer harder and a bit distracting, because of the different alignement of the first words of each line. In the end, it gives jumping to the next line a bit more of unneccessary friction. Thats in addition the friction thats already there, because it is a line break and you have to move your eyes all over the place. With the centered text the anticipated spot where to look for the next word is no longer valid, which makes the transition slower.
If would suggest to roll back this change, because the little improvement in style does not justify the sacrifices in ergonomics.
One could think about an opt-in setting to enable different kinds of text alignement, for users that wish to do so nevertheless. However using
text-align: start;
as default setting would be benefical for most of the users due to the stated reasons.5e656e3
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, I have received a few complaints that this was not a good idea. Reverted it back.