Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): bump github.com/evanphx/json-patch to v5.9.11 #682

Merged

Conversation

mmorel-35
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Feb 7, 2025

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 7, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 53.48%. Comparing base (8849c3f) to head (65e83c1).
Report is 27 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #682      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   54.26%   53.48%   -0.79%     
==========================================
  Files          64       64              
  Lines        6164     6342     +178     
==========================================
+ Hits         3345     3392      +47     
- Misses       2549     2679     +130     
- Partials      270      271       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@mmorel-35 mmorel-35 marked this pull request as ready for review February 7, 2025 20:26
@mmorel-35 mmorel-35 requested a review from a team as a code owner February 7, 2025 20:26
@crenshaw-dev crenshaw-dev merged commit 11a5e25 into argoproj:master Feb 7, 2025
5 checks passed
@mmorel-35 mmorel-35 deleted the github.com/evanphx/json-patch/v5 branch February 7, 2025 20:39
Aaron-9900 pushed a commit to Aaron-9900/gitops-engine that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants