Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Add SAST to repo with codeql action #146

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 2, 2023
Merged

chore: Add SAST to repo with codeql action #146

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 2, 2023

Conversation

cpswan
Copy link
Member

@cpswan cpswan commented Nov 2, 2023

We're presently getting a scorecard ding for the lack of SAST https://github.com/atsign-foundation/at_java/security/code-scanning/4

- What I did

Added the codeql workflow to implement SAST

- How I did it

cp ../at_python/.github/workflows/codeql.yml .github/workflows/

Then changed language: ["java"]

- How to verify it

Future commits should be tested by the workflow and drive up the scorecard score.

- Description for the changelog

chore: Add SAST to repo with codeql action

@cpswan cpswan self-assigned this Nov 2, 2023
@github-advanced-security
Copy link

This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation.

@cpswan cpswan merged commit 97aaa09 into trunk Nov 2, 2023
4 checks passed
@cpswan cpswan deleted the cpswan-codeql branch November 2, 2023 17:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants