Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: use obstacle_cruise_planner by default #682

Conversation

takayuki5168
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Based on the following discussion, we switch the stop planner from obstacle_stop_planner to obstacle_cruise_planner.
https://github.com/orgs/autowarefoundation/discussions/3964

Tests performed

Not applicable.

Effects on system behavior

Not applicable.

Pre-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below when creating the PR.

In-review checklist for the PR reviewers

The PR reviewers must check the checkboxes below before approval.

Post-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below before merging.

  • There are no open discussions or they are tracked via tickets.

After all checkboxes are checked, anyone who has write access can merge the PR.

@takayuki5168 takayuki5168 marked this pull request as ready for review November 9, 2023 07:44
@takayuki5168 takayuki5168 force-pushed the feat/use-obstacle-cruise-planner branch from d703a1e to 8424227 Compare November 15, 2023 16:22
takayuki5168 referenced this pull request in tier4/autoware_launch Nov 26, 2023
@takayuki5168
Copy link
Contributor Author

Replaced by #765

@takayuki5168 takayuki5168 deleted the feat/use-obstacle-cruise-planner branch January 6, 2024 15:07
maxime-clem pushed a commit to maxime-clem/autoware_launch that referenced this pull request Feb 6, 2024
mitukou1109 pushed a commit to mitukou1109/autoware_launch that referenced this pull request Dec 23, 2024
…graph

feat(rviz): visualize error diag graph
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant