Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(autoware_lanelet_map_validator): add dangling reference checker to non existing intersection_area #177

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions map/autoware_lanelet2_map_validator/CMakeLists.txt
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ if(BUILD_TESTING)
add_validation_test(missing_referrers_for_traffic_lights)
add_validation_test(intersection_area_validity)
add_validation_test(intersection_area_segment_type)
add_validation_test(intersection_area_dangling_reference)
endif()

ament_auto_package(
Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
// Copyright 2024 Autoware Foundation
//
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
// you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
// You may obtain a copy of the License at
//
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
//
// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
// distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
// WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
// limitations under the License.

#ifndef LANELET2_MAP_VALIDATOR__VALIDATORS__INTERSECTION__INTERSECTION_AREA_DANGLING_REFERENCE_HPP_ // NOLINT
#define LANELET2_MAP_VALIDATOR__VALIDATORS__INTERSECTION__INTERSECTION_AREA_DANGLING_REFERENCE_HPP_ // NOLINT

#include <lanelet2_validation/Validation.h>
#include <lanelet2_validation/ValidatorFactory.h>

#include <string>
#include <utility>

namespace lanelet::autoware::validation
{
class IntersectionAreaDanglingReferenceValidator : public lanelet::validation::MapValidator
{
public:
constexpr static const char * name()
{
return "mapping.intersection.intersection_area_dangling_reference";
}

lanelet::validation::Issues operator()(const lanelet::LaneletMap & map) override;

private:
/**
* @brief queries all intersection lanelets and check if their "intersection_area" custom KEY
* entry has existing id as VALUE
*
* @param map
* @return lanelet::validation::Issues
*/
lanelet::validation::Issues check_intersection_area_dangling_reference(
const lanelet::LaneletMap & map);
};
} // namespace lanelet::autoware::validation

// clang-format off
#endif // LANELET2_MAP_VALIDATOR__VALIDATORS__INTERSECTION__INTERSECTION_AREA_DANGLING_REFERENCE_HPP_ // NOLINT
// clang-format on
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think that the order

  1. Collect all intersection_area polygons first
  2. Scan through lanelets and find defected lanelets using is_intersection_with_area.

will be much efficient that we don't need to collect intersection_with_area_lanelets, but what do you think?

Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
// Copyright 2024 Autoware Foundation
//
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
// you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
// You may obtain a copy of the License at
//
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
//
// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
// distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
// WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
// limitations under the License.

#include "lanelet2_map_validator/validators/intersection/intersection_area_dangling_reference.hpp"

#include "lanelet2_map_validator/utils.hpp"

#include <lanelet2_core/LaneletMap.h>

#include <optional>
#include <string>
#include <unordered_set>
#include <vector>

namespace lanelet::autoware::validation
{

namespace
{
lanelet::validation::RegisterMapValidator<IntersectionAreaDanglingReferenceValidator> reg;
} // namespace

lanelet::validation::Issues IntersectionAreaDanglingReferenceValidator::operator()(
const lanelet::LaneletMap & map)
{
lanelet::validation::Issues issues;

lanelet::autoware::validation::appendIssues(
issues, check_intersection_area_dangling_reference(map));

return issues;
}

lanelet::validation::Issues
IntersectionAreaDanglingReferenceValidator::check_intersection_area_dangling_reference(
const lanelet::LaneletMap & map)
{
// returns the VALUE of intersection_area key
auto is_intersection_with_area = [](const auto & lanelet) -> std::optional<lanelet::Id> {
if (lanelet.attributeOr("turn_direction", "none") == std::string("none")) {
return std::nullopt;
}
Comment on lines +51 to +53
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this part necessary?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it is not good for a non-intersection lane to have "intersection_area" entry cause it's meaningless. And current implementation ignores that anyway. But I think we should sanitize that.


const std::string id_str = lanelet.attributeOr("intersection_area", "none");
if (id_str == std::string("none")) {
return std::nullopt;
}

const auto id = static_cast<lanelet::Id>(std::atoi(id_str.c_str()));
return id;
};

std::vector<std::pair<lanelet::ConstLanelet, lanelet::Id>> intersection_with_area_lanelets;
for (const auto & lanelet : map.laneletLayer) {
if (const auto id_opt = is_intersection_with_area(lanelet); id_opt) {
intersection_with_area_lanelets.emplace_back(lanelet, id_opt.value());
}
}

std::unordered_set<lanelet::Id> intersection_area_ids;
for (const auto & area : map.polygonLayer) {
if (
area.attributeOr(lanelet::AttributeName::Type, "none") == std::string("intersection_area")) {
intersection_area_ids.emplace(area.id());
}
}

lanelet::validation::Issues issues;
for (const auto & [lanelet, intersection_area_id] : intersection_with_area_lanelets) {
if (intersection_area_ids.find(intersection_area_id) == intersection_area_ids.end()) {
issues.emplace_back(
lanelet::validation::Severity::Error, lanelet::validation::Primitive::Lanelet, lanelet.id(),
append_issue_code_prefix(
this->name(), 1,
"Lanelet of ID " + std::to_string(lanelet.id()) +
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The primitive (lanelet) and its ID will be displayed automatically since they are already given in L83, so the message starting with "This lanelet" might be fine.

" has dangling reference to non-existing intersection area of ID " +
std::to_string(intersection_area_id)));
}
}

return issues;
}

} // namespace lanelet::autoware::validation
Loading
Loading