-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ORV2-2755 - STOS application form and review #1674
Conversation
…s with eligible subtypes instead, move hardcoded permit-specific constants from json to .ts files
…or each of the application form sections
…pplication form data
…stom form components, refactor code for permittedCommodity
… remove hardcoded test permit commodities values
… and modified vehicle details modal for STOS
…angeApplicationFormValues
…configuration loading and policy instantiation failed
…ation form values
…to drive vehicle configuration based on selected commodity
…ion and amend forms
…ead of save application hook
…cation steps for queue context, fix bug with saving power unit to inventory from permit form
"node_modules/jsonpath-plus": { | ||
"version": "7.2.0", | ||
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/jsonpath-plus/-/jsonpath-plus-7.2.0.tgz", | ||
"integrity": "sha512-zBfiUPM5nD0YZSBT/o/fbCUlCcepMIdP0CJZxM1+KgA4f2T206f6VAg9e7mX35+KlMaIc5qXW34f3BnwJ3w+RA==", | ||
"license": "MIT", | ||
"engines": { | ||
"node": ">=12.0.0" | ||
} | ||
}, |
Check failure
Code scanning / Trivy
jsonpath-plus: Remote Code Execution in jsonpath-plus via Improper Input Sanitization
…n for staff users
Quality Gate passed for 'onroutebc_policy'Issues Measures |
Quality Gate passed for 'onroutebc dops'Issues Measures |
Quality Gate passed for 'onroutebc_scheduler'Issues Measures |
Quality Gate passed for 'onroutebc vehicles'Issues Measures |
Quality Gate failed for 'onroutebc frontend'Failed conditions |
Description
Please provide a summary of the change and the issue fixed. Please include relevant context. List dependency changes.
Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration
Checklist
Further comments
Please ensure that the configuration (env variables, deployment vite and yaml files) is correct for accommodating the policy engine url/integration.
Thanks for the PR!
Deployments, as required, will be available below:
Please create PRs in draft mode. Mark as ready to enable:
After merge, new images are promoted to: