Temporary remove FileWriter support when exporting video

[McGiverGim]

Workaround for #492

Since some update of our code (I suppose some new Node version or similar), the FileWriter constructor.name does not contain the FileWriter value anymore, now it contains EventTarget. This produces the behaviour of the issue.

I've opened an issue in the library to see if we can get a real fix for that: thenickdude/webm-writer-js#31 because it is a good idea to stream to disk directly and not to memory.

But until then, this PR removes the FileWriter support and uses the "on memory" stream of the video.

[sonarqubecloud]

SonarCloud Quality Gate failed.

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
2 Code Smells

No Coverage information
0.0% Duplication

[meoso]

i tested and it technically works, but very weird to ask for filename after processing, IMHO.

[McGiverGim]

@meoso true, I prefer to select the file first, and in this way use less memory. But the problem is outside our code and not depends of us. We can try to migrate to a different library, but I don't know if there are other options out there.

[haslinghuis]

For reference:
https://itnext.io/using-node-js-to-read-really-really-large-files-pt-1-d2057fe76b33

[github-actions]

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs within a week.

[meoso]

I presume y'all don't want to go backwards, but version 0.48.4 is the last version that works as expected.
Could potentially use differing NWjs based on OS.

e.g.

    var NWversion;
    switch (os.platform()) {
        case 'linux':
            NWversion ='0.48.4';
            break;
        default:
            NWversion ='0.50.2';
    }

[McGiverGim]

It does not only fail under Linux. Windows has the same problem.

[ctzsnooze]

Approved

[blckmn]

AUTOMERGE: (FAIL)

• github identifies PR as mergeable -> FAIL
• assigned to a milestone -> PASS
• cooling off period lapsed -> PASS
• commit count less or equal to three -> PASS
• Don't merge label NOT found -> PASS
• at least one RN: label found -> PASS
• Tested label found -> PASS
• assigned to an approver -> PASS
• approver count at least three -> FAIL

[ctzsnooze]

@McGiverGim - I have lost track of whether this is needed still?

[McGiverGim]

Yes it is. I've a suggestion of code to test to see if it fixes the real problem, maybe this week I can get some time for it.

[McGiverGim]

This must be reverted. It was an alternate solution. If we merged the other this must be reverted.