Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PM-10873] Updated errors thrown when creating organization on selfhost to be more specific #5007

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

cturnbull-bitwarden
Copy link
Contributor

🎟️ Tracking

https://bitwarden.atlassian.net/browse/PM-10873

📔 Objective

Updated the self-hosted server's validation when uploading a new license. Updates are to ensure that the plan specified on the license exists, is not disabled, and also that the license type is accurate.

📸 Screenshots

image
image
image

⏰ Reminders before review

  • Contributor guidelines followed
  • All formatters and local linters executed and passed
  • Written new unit and / or integration tests where applicable
  • Protected functional changes with optionality (feature flags)
  • Used internationalization (i18n) for all UI strings
  • CI builds passed
  • Communicated to DevOps any deployment requirements
  • Updated any necessary documentation (Confluence, contributing docs) or informed the documentation team

🦮 Reviewer guidelines

  • 👍 (:+1:) or similar for great changes
  • 📝 (:memo:) or ℹ️ (:information_source:) for notes or general info
  • ❓ (:question:) for questions
  • 🤔 (:thinking:) or 💭 (:thought_balloon:) for more open inquiry that's not quite a confirmed issue and could potentially benefit from discussion
  • 🎨 (:art:) for suggestions / improvements
  • ❌ (:x:) or ⚠️ (:warning:) for more significant problems or concerns needing attention
  • 🌱 (:seedling:) or ♻️ (:recycle:) for future improvements or indications of technical debt
  • ⛏ (:pick:) for minor or nitpick changes

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 8, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 10 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 42.58%. Comparing base (702a81b) to head (b6907db).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...le/Services/Implementations/OrganizationService.cs 0.00% 10 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5007      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   42.58%   42.58%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1406     1406              
  Lines       65074    65081       +7     
  Branches     5962     5963       +1     
==========================================
  Hits        27715    27715              
- Misses      36131    36138       +7     
  Partials     1228     1228              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 8, 2024

Logo
Checkmarx One – Scan Summary & Details700fd78e-753c-4a05-a3bd-369dfa038090

Fixed Issues

Severity Issue Source File / Package
MEDIUM CSRF /src/Api/AdminConsole/Controllers/PoliciesController.cs: 68
MEDIUM CSRF /src/Api/Auth/Controllers/EmergencyAccessController.cs: 102
MEDIUM CSRF /src/Api/AdminConsole/Controllers/PoliciesController.cs: 89
MEDIUM CSRF /src/Api/AdminConsole/Controllers/PoliciesController.cs: 159
MEDIUM CSRF /src/Api/AdminConsole/Public/Controllers/PoliciesController.cs: 42
MEDIUM CSRF /src/Api/AdminConsole/Public/Controllers/PoliciesController.cs: 61
MEDIUM CSRF /src/Api/Auth/Controllers/EmergencyAccessController.cs: 159
MEDIUM CSRF /src/Api/Auth/Controllers/EmergencyAccessController.cs: 102
LOW Log_Forging /src/Api/Auth/Controllers/EmergencyAccessController.cs: 102

Copy link
Member

@vincentsalucci vincentsalucci left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⛏️ Would really love to see some unit tests around the newly added error paths.

SAST scan failed

Looks good otherwise!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants