Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update trufflehog to 3.86.1 #2060

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 13, 2024
Merged

Update trufflehog to 3.86.1 #2060

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 13, 2024

Conversation

blsaccess
Copy link
Contributor

@blsaccess blsaccess commented Dec 6, 2024

This PR uses https://api.github.com/repos/trufflesecurity/trufflehog/releases/latest to obtain the latest version of trufflehog and update the version in bbot/modules/trufflehog.py.

Release notes:

What's Changed

Full Changelog: trufflesecurity/trufflehog@v3.86.0...v3.86.1

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 6, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 93%. Comparing base (e4905f8) to head (3eb2a78).
Report is 2 commits behind head on dev.

Additional details and impacted files
@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##             dev   #2060   +/-   ##
=====================================
- Coverage     93%     93%   -0%     
=====================================
  Files        376     376           
  Lines      28672   28672           
=====================================
- Hits       26466   26461    -5     
- Misses      2206    2211    +5     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@blsaccess blsaccess changed the title Update trufflehog to 3.85.0 Update trufflehog to 3.86.0 Dec 11, 2024
@blsaccess blsaccess changed the title Update trufflehog to 3.86.0 Update trufflehog to 3.86.1 Dec 12, 2024
@TheTechromancer TheTechromancer merged commit 2415fdb into dev Dec 13, 2024
14 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants