Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New Module: Ajaxpro #909

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Dec 19, 2023
Merged

New Module: Ajaxpro #909

merged 6 commits into from
Dec 19, 2023

Conversation

liquidsec
Copy link
Collaborator

Will detect instance of Ajaxpro, using a couple of different techniques that should detect a range of installations.

Older versions are vulnerable to an unauthenticated RCE: https://mogwailabs.de/en/blog/2022/01/vulnerability-spotlight-rce-in-ajax.net-professional/. Even patched versions can be vulnerable if there are custom classes in use which happen to have exploitable methods.

adding safe tag
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 15, 2023

Codecov Report

Attention: 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (15d0798) 92% compared to head (c8eb6e0) 92%.
Report is 17 commits behind head on dev.

Files Patch % Lines
bbot/modules/ajaxpro.py 97% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##             dev    #909    +/-   ##
======================================
- Coverage     92%     92%    -0%     
======================================
  Files        290     294     +4     
  Lines      18018   18188   +170     
======================================
+ Hits       16559   16715   +156     
- Misses      1459    1473    +14     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@liquidsec liquidsec merged commit f3e8507 into dev Dec 19, 2023
8 checks passed
@liquidsec liquidsec deleted the ajaxpro branch December 19, 2023 20:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants