Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: consistent usage of Du vs Sie #326

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 28, 2024
Merged

Conversation

pixelass
Copy link
Member

Motivation

Issues closed

Copy link

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
+0.00% (target: -1.00%)
Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
Common ancestor commit (921105f) 2114 1986 93.95%
Head commit (29b53e6) 2114 (+0) 1986 (+0) 93.95% (+0.00%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
Pull request (#326) 0 0 ∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

Codacy will stop sending the deprecated coverage status from June 5th, 2024. Learn more

@pixelass pixelass merged commit 0c4b239 into alpha May 28, 2024
4 checks passed
@pixelass pixelass deleted the feat/better-translations-de branch May 28, 2024 17:09
TimPietrusky pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 28, 2024
# [1.0.0-alpha.97](v1.0.0-alpha.96...v1.0.0-alpha.97) (2024-05-28)

### Features

* consistent usage of Du vs Sie ([#326](#326)) ([0c4b239](0c4b239))
@TimPietrusky
Copy link
Member

🎉 This PR is included in version 1.0.0-alpha.97 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants