Lexicons for 3rd-party labelers

[pfrazee]

Lexicons for:

• labeler records
• labeler views
• xrpc methods for fetching labelers

[pfrazee]

In the preferences, I have the user setting visibility for label groups. In the labeler declaration, however, I have the labeler declaring the supported label values. My thinking is that our label definitions will be updated to include the label <=> label-group mapping, and that we'll assemble the label groups from the list of declared labels.

[pfrazee]

Unsure if we want to support ! imperative labels from 3P labelers

[dholms]

Unsure if we want to support ! imperative labels from 3P labelers

I would advocate yes

[dholms]

My thinking is that our label definitions will be updated to include the label <=> label-group mapping, and that we'll assemble the label groups from the list of declared labels.

Not quite sure I follow here... By "label definitions" do you mean the signed label objects that get passed around? Or do you mean the definitions that live over here?

[pfrazee]

Unsure if we want to support ! imperative labels from 3P labelers

I would advocate yes

Just bear in mind, it's not configurable. Essentially this would give any labeler you add the power to quietly !filter, for instance

[pfrazee]

My thinking is that our label definitions will be updated to include the label <=> label-group mapping, and that we'll assemble the label groups from the list of declared labels.

Not quite sure I follow here... By "label definitions" do you mean the signed label objects that get passed around? Or do you mean the definitions that live over here?

Yeah the latter, the label value definitions

[dholms]

looks good to me 👍