-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 599
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ozone ACLs #2252
Merged
Merged
Ozone ACLs #2252
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
28 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
6a26396
tidy bsky auth
dholms 125f721
hook up new auth verifier
dholms 36da1d9
update auth throughout ozone
dholms 32b3de8
handle mod signing keys
dholms 199b754
fix bad var
dholms d1d39ff
merge main
dholms cb53fdc
fix key parsing in pds
dholms e3bfb17
fix admin auth test
dholms a642063
rename test
dholms f7ef546
update did doc id values
dholms 0482a92
null creds string -> `none`
dholms 5df31de
fix fetchLabels auth check
dholms dd891d4
:sparkles: Add a couple more proxied requests that we use in ozone ui
foysalit 2ca4fee
Add runit to the services/bsky Dockerfile (#2254)
Jacob2161 6ba5f6c
Improve tag detection (#2260)
estrattonbailey 9b2500e
Version packages (#2261)
github-actions[bot] c76fd03
:bug: Increment attempt count after each attempt to push ozone event …
foysalit 87f00f2
Ozone delegates email sending to actor's pds (#2272)
devinivy 8341c7a
fix auth verifier method
dholms 11b7af2
merge main
dholms 037f163
better error handling for get account infos
dholms fc1c40d
fix labeler service id
dholms 5e1c5fd
fix iss on auth headers
dholms 82acea2
fix dev-env ozone did
dholms 4c7db5c
fix tests & another jwt issuer
dholms 81f9d69
ozone: fix ip check
devinivy 7be8445
fix aud check on pds mod service auth
dholms 592518c
tidy
dholms File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Making sure I understand correctly—this means the mod service can view takedowns either:
Does that sound right? If so, when does the latter come into play?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yup that does sound right - maybe it could be communicated better.
But the latter comes into play on some of the view routes where we still want to show taken down content -
getProfile
for instanceThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We could use a separate authVerifier there like
optionalStandardOrModService
but I thought it was a bit clearer to just useoptionalStandard
and then do a follow on check to see if it came from a trusted did