Update French translations

[surfdude29]

Following on from my previous PR, I have followed the same process to update the French translations.

The way labelers are described in strings is a bit inconsistent, sometimes labeler, sometimes moderation service etc. At the moment, I have simply tried to translate (with the huge help of DeepL of course 😄) the strings as they are, but now I'm thinking that perhaps aiming for more consistency would be a better approach?

Anyway, all feedback from native French speakers is gratefully welcomed – especially @Signez who was so helpful last time 🙏 Please forgive all the grammatical mistakes that I'm sure are in there, and tell me how best to fix them :)

Merci! 😊

[Signez]

First look at that translation update. Again, it's a lot of nitpicks, but there are some errors I am glad to have been able to pick up. I have to admit that I had to jump on-and-off the code quite a lot to make sure to understand how some strings were used too 😅 (it's both a good and a bad thing: it means I don't encounter them most of the time, so that's good! it also means that there are not enough i18n hints to translators, and that's quite annoying, so maybe we should take sometime at some point to improve that!)

[Signez]

My opinion on the étiqueteur / service d’étiquetage matter: honestly it's not that important here, as those are not humans. It matters that we translate the moderators by la modération (and not les modérateurs) because they can be humans; a labeler is more of a service that is operated by moderators, so it's not that important to translate them in a gender-neutral way.

[surfdude29]

Thank you so much again @Signez for all your excellent corrections, I've just committed the changes 🙏

[surfdude29]

Just to double-check, is crus OK here? That seemed to fit the closest of the translations in the dictionary I was looking at, but maybe there's a more appropriate word?

[surfdude29]

Again, it's a lot of nitpicks, but there are some errors I am glad to have been able to pick up.

I really appreciate all the nitpicks and the corrections! 🙏

I have to admit that I had to jump on-and-off the code quite a lot to make sure to understand how some strings were used too 😅

It's very kind of you to review it in such detail 🔍

(it's both a good and a bad thing: it means I don't encounter them most of the time, so that's good! it also means that there are not enough i18n hints to translators, and that's quite annoying, so maybe we should take sometime at some point to improve that!)

One of the things I've noticed as well is that often there can be accessibiltyHints that are virtually the same as the corresponding accessibilityLabel, and I know very little about accessibility things but I wonder how useful that really is to those who use screen readers?

And yes I agree that more of the i18n context hints would definitely be useful for translators 👍

[surfdude29]

My opinion on the étiqueteur / service d’étiquetage matter: honestly it's not that important here, as those are not humans. It matters that we translate the moderators by la modération (and not les modérateurs) because they can be humans; a labeler is more of a service that is operated by moderators, so it's not that important to translate them in a gender-neutral way.

Cool, makes sense to me :)

[pfrazee]

Thanks everybody. Good to go?

[Signez]

Honestly, yeah! @surfdude29 did a great job, and with the edits I suggested and that they already applied (with their awesome reactivity 👌), it looks good to me!

Or as we say in my country, 🥖🚀🥖🚀

[surfdude29]

Honestly, yeah! @surfdude29 did a great job, and with the edits I suggested and that they already applied (with their awesome reactivity 👌), it looks good to me!

Or as we say in my country, 🥖🚀🥖🚀

If @Signez is happy then we're good to go! 🥖🚀🙌

[pfrazee]

Awesome!! Thanks yall!