Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove useless line #190

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Oct 19, 2024
Merged

Remove useless line #190

merged 5 commits into from
Oct 19, 2024

Conversation

bobthemighty
Copy link
Owner

I think this line of code was intended to support the recursive resolution case in test_chain_dependencies, ie, if the service depends on itself, then recursively resolve it, putting things in the context as you go.

It's not necessary, though, since _build_impl already handles that.

This fixes #169

I think this line of code was intended to support the recursive
resolution case in test_chain_dependencies, ie, if the service depends
on itself, then recursively resolve it, putting things in the context as
you go.

It's not necessary, though, since _build_impl already handles that.

This fixes #169
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 19, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.0%. Comparing base (5b79f16) to head (1ec944f).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #190   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   100.0%   100.0%           
=======================================
  Files           2        2           
  Lines         172      170    -2     
  Branches       18       17    -1     
=======================================
- Hits          172      170    -2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@bobthemighty
Copy link
Owner Author

This does work, but means we're not using the context cache in tests. Really need to spend some time to remember how this is supposed to function.

@bobthemighty bobthemighty merged commit f592014 into main Oct 19, 2024
10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Priority for kwargs, or support for recursive resolve
1 participant