Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Skip CI builds (GHA, Appveyor) on README updates. #257

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 29, 2024

Conversation

jeking3
Copy link
Collaborator

@jeking3 jeking3 commented Dec 28, 2024

Does not trigger CI when only files in the list are updated.

References:

Appveyor
GitHub Actions

Tested in boostorg/assign by committing these changes and then committing changes only to the README.md file; in this case CI did not run in GHA or Appveyor.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 29, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (14db964) to head (1bf6970).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master      #257   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            2         2           
  Lines           22        22           
  Branches        10        10           
=========================================
  Hits            22        22           

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 14db964...1bf6970. Read the comment docs.

@Flamefire Flamefire merged commit 3ed5c6f into master Dec 29, 2024
67 checks passed
@Flamefire Flamefire deleted the skip-ci-on-README-update branch December 29, 2024 13:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants