docs: added OpenBSD to readme

[transgirllucy]

related to this PR #880

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for dpp-dev ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	e07d76f
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/dpp-dev/deploys/65114eb68322ff0007d59144
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-891--dpp-dev.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

[Jaskowicz1]

You'll need to change the name of this PR to be something like refactor: added OpenBSD to readme to follow the naming convention for PRs!

Other than this, I'm not entirely sure this is stable on OpenBSD either and would require more testing. I do know that clang and g++ on OpenBSD refuse to see libdpp.so.10.0.26 in /usr/local/lib so I don't know if we want to say it's "stable" when you can't use it after make install.

[braindigitalis]

@mrtuxa are the many issues with openbsd that @Jaskowicz1 is having an "us problem", or is there a fix? Do they need to be part of this change if we are claiming its fully supported?

[transgirllucy]

@mrtuxa are the many issues with openbsd that @Jaskowicz1 is having an "us problem", or is there a fix? Do they need to be part of this change if we are claiming its fully supported?

i will do some tests the next days

[Jaskowicz1]

@mrtuxa are the many issues with openbsd that @Jaskowicz1 is having an "us problem", or is there a fix? Do they need to be part of this change if we are claiming its fully supported?

i will do some tests the next days

Thank you :)

[transgirllucy]

@mrtuxa are the many issues with openbsd that @Jaskowicz1 is having an "us problem", or is there a fix? Do they need to be part of this change if we are claiming its fully supported?

i will do some tests the next days

Thank you :)

But the problem is i'm not very familiar with OpenBSD but I try my best

[Jaskowicz1]

@mrtuxa are the many issues with openbsd that @Jaskowicz1 is having an "us problem", or is there a fix? Do they need to be part of this change if we are claiming its fully supported?

i will do some tests the next days

Thank you :)

But the problem is i'm not very familiar with OpenBSD but I try my best

Don't worry! If you manage to get it working, tell us what you did and I'll see if I can get it working too.

[Jaskowicz1]

After #901 , I'm happy to say this PR is okay! DPP is functional and stable on OpenBSD, the issues that occur on OpenBSD are not related to DPP so people just need to use CMake (which we highly encourage for other platforms anyways).