Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Klaus functional test to CI #35

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 23, 2023
Merged

Add Klaus functional test to CI #35

merged 3 commits into from
Nov 23, 2023

Conversation

breqdev
Copy link
Owner

@breqdev breqdev commented Nov 23, 2023

Adds the Klaus Dormann 6502 Functional Test as a Rust #[test]. This will run this test in CI.

The test loads the starting address (0x400) and verifies that the program ends up in the success loop.

An extension needed to be made to BlockMemory to accommodate how the Klaus test behaves like a ROM yet requires self-modifying code.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 23, 2023

Codecov Report

Attention: 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (f1595eb) 19.93% compared to head (cb4c86a) 25.93%.

Files Patch % Lines
src/main.rs 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #35      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   19.93%   25.93%   +5.99%     
==========================================
  Files          40       40              
  Lines        8714     8731      +17     
==========================================
+ Hits         1737     2264     +527     
+ Misses       6977     6467     -510     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@breqdev breqdev force-pushed the bc/klaus-tests-in-ci branch from 3f085a7 to cb4c86a Compare November 23, 2023 00:48
@breqdev breqdev merged commit 4e03205 into main Nov 23, 2023
5 checks passed
@ava-silver ava-silver deleted the bc/klaus-tests-in-ci branch December 30, 2023 07:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant