make unique warnings

[yacinebbt]

following your request in the PR #1603, i am recreating this in order to push it in the dev branch.

besides the description in the old PR, here is an example of how this will reduce amount of logs in the bunkerweb controller pod.

here is the logs before adding my commit:

[2025-01-21 10:22:20 +0000] [AUTOCONF] [1] [ℹ️ ] - Instance #3 : bunkerweb-z8w7k
[2025-01-21 10:22:20 +0000] [AUTOCONF] [1] [ℹ️ ] - Processing events ...
[2025-01-21 10:22:21 +0000] [KUBERNETES-CONTROLLER] [1] [⚠️ ] - Ignoring unsupported ingress rule without backend service port number.
[2025-01-21 10:22:21 +0000] [KUBERNETES-CONTROLLER] [1] [ℹ️ ] - Caught kubernetes event (ingress), deploying new configuration ...
[2025-01-21 10:22:21 +0000] [CONFIG] [1] [⚠️ ] - Variable DUMMY_SETTING: value is not a valid setting, ignoring it
[2025-01-21 10:22:21 +0000] [CONFIG] [1] [⚠️ ] - Variable DUMMY_SETTING: value is not a valid setting, ignoring it
[2025-01-21 10:22:21 +0000] [CONFIG] [1] [⚠️ ] - Variable DUMMY_SETTING: value is not a valid setting, ignoring it
[2025-01-21 10:22:21 +0000] [KUBERNETES-CONTROLLER] [1] [ℹ️ ] - Successfully deployed new configuration 🚀
[2025-01-21 10:22:22 +0000] [KUBERNETES-CONTROLLER] [1] [⚠️ ] - Ignoring unsupported ingress rule without backend service port number.
[2025-01-21 10:22:23 +0000] [KUBERNETES-CONTROLLER] [1] [⚠️ ] - Ignoring unsupported ingress rule without backend service port number.
[2025-01-21 10:22:23 +0000] [KUBERNETES-CONTROLLER] [1] [⚠️ ] - Ignoring unsupported ingress rule without backend service port number.
[2025-01-21 10:22:24 +0000] [KUBERNETES-CONTROLLER] [1] [⚠️ ] - Ignoring unsupported ingress rule without backend service port number.
[2025-01-21 10:22:25 +0000] [KUBERNETES-CONTROLLER] [1] [⚠️ ] - Ignoring unsupported ingress rule without backend service port number.
[2025-01-21 10:22:26 +0000] [KUBERNETES-CONTROLLER] [1] [⚠️ ] - Ignoring unsupported ingress rule without backend service port number.
[2025-01-21 10:22:26 +0000] [KUBERNETES-CONTROLLER] [1] [⚠️ ] - Ignoring unsupported ingress rule without backend service port number.
...

as you may notice, the name of the service is not known, as well as the amount of logs that's keeps showing in the pod's logs.

After adding my commit, you'll have something like this:

[2025-01-21 10:55:50 +0000] [AUTOCONF] [1] [ℹ️ ] - Kubernetes mode detected
[2025-01-21 10:55:51 +0000] [CONFIG] [1] [ℹ️ ] - ✅ Database connection established
[2025-01-21 10:55:51 +0000] [AUTOCONF] [1] [ℹ️ ] - Waiting for BunkerWeb instances ...
[2025-01-21 10:55:51 +0000] [AUTOCONF] [1] [ℹ️ ] - BunkerWeb instances are ready 🚀
[2025-01-21 10:55:51 +0000] [AUTOCONF] [1] [ℹ️ ] - Instance #1 : bunkerweb-47r7n
[2025-01-21 10:55:51 +0000] [AUTOCONF] [1] [ℹ️ ] - Instance #2 : bunkerweb-6lqvd
[2025-01-21 10:55:51 +0000] [AUTOCONF] [1] [ℹ️ ] - Instance #3 : bunkerweb-z8w7k
[2025-01-21 10:55:51 +0000] [AUTOCONF] [1] [ℹ️ ] - Processing events ...
[2025-01-21 10:55:52 +0000] [KUBERNETES-CONTROLLER] [1] [⚠️ ] - Ignoring unsupported ingress rule without backend service port number for service hubble-ui.
[2025-01-21 10:55:52 +0000] [KUBERNETES-CONTROLLER] [1] [ℹ️ ] - Successfully deployed new configuration 🚀
[2025-01-21 11:24:10 +0000] [KUBERNETES-CONTROLLER] [1] [ℹ️ ] - Caught kubernetes event (ingress), deploying new configuration ...
[2025-01-21 11:24:10 +0000] [KUBERNETES-CONTROLLER] [1] [ℹ️ ] - Successfully deployed new configuration 🚀

in my case, it was my ingress hubble configured this way:

...
  rules:
    - host: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
      http:
        paths:
          - path: /
            pathType: Prefix
            backend:
              service:
                name: hubble-ui
                port:
                  name: http 

for all deployed ingresses that will be based on port name instead of port numbers, you'll only have one unique log entry for each ingress along with the ingress name.

[yacinebbt]

it is important to mention that the file i used to test this, was the src/autoconf/IngressController.py in the master branch.

[TheophileDiot]

Hi @yacinebbt, we'll probably remove the log anyways but thank you for pointing it out

[TheophileDiot]

92ef874