Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add typings for blueprint code #250

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 21, 2025
Merged

Add typings for blueprint code #250

merged 3 commits into from
Feb 21, 2025

Conversation

Quantumplation
Copy link
Collaborator

@Quantumplation Quantumplation commented Feb 20, 2025

This adds strong typing for the blueprint generation code, and improves the format of the generated code.

This is in preparation to rewrite the data serialization stuff to better handle recursive types.

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Feb 20, 2025

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: deaa0e1

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

The code generation should now be a bit more readable, and output nicer formatted generated code
@Quantumplation Quantumplation changed the title Add better support for recursive types Add typings for blueprint code Feb 21, 2025
@Quantumplation Quantumplation marked this pull request as ready for review February 21, 2025 17:06
@Quantumplation Quantumplation merged commit 3838b63 into main Feb 21, 2025
3 checks passed
@Quantumplation Quantumplation deleted the pi/recursive-types branch February 21, 2025 17:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants